Combinatorial codes in ventral temporal lobe for object recognition: Haxby (2001) revisited: is there a “face” area?

Haxby et al. [Science 293 (2001) 2425] recently argued that category-related responses in the ventral temporal (VT) lobe during visual object identification were overlapping and distributed in topography. This observation contrasts with prevailing views that object codes are focal and localized to specific areas such as the fusiform and parahippocampal gyri. We provide a critical test of Haxby's hypothesis using a neural network (NN) classifier that can detect more general topographic representations and achieves 83% correct generalization performance on patterns of voxel responses in out-of-sample tests. Using voxel-wise sensitivity analysis we show that substantially the same VT lobe voxels contribute to the classification of all object categories, suggesting the code is combinatorial. Moreover, we found no evidence for local single category representations. The neural network representations of the voxel codes were sensitive to both category and superordinate level features that were only available implicitly in the object categories.

[1]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  S. Zeki,et al.  Functional brain mapping during free viewing of natural scenes , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Nathalie Japkowicz,et al.  Nonlinear Autoassociation Is Not Equivalent to PCA , 2000, Neural Computation.

[10]  L. Buck,et al.  Combinatorial Receptor Codes for Odors , 1999, Cell.

[11]  T. Carlson,et al.  Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects , 2003 .

[12]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Towards a network theory of cognition , 2000, Neural Networks.

[14]  Stephen José Hanson,et al.  What connectionist models learn: Learning and representation in connectionist networks , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  How Distributed Is Visual Category Information in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex? An fMRI Study , 2002, Neuron.

[16]  Martin Fodslette Møller,et al.  A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning , 1993, Neural Networks.

[17]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body , 2001, Science.

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Face-selective Activation in a Congenital Prosopagnosic Subject , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  Evaluating subject specific preprocessing choices in multisubject fMRI data sets using data-driven performance metrics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[26]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[27]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Carlson,et al.  Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  J. Fodor Modularity of mind , 1983 .