Fast Solution of $\ell _{1}$ -Norm Minimization Problems When the Solution May Be Sparse

The minimum lscr1-norm solution to an underdetermined system of linear equations y=Ax is often, remarkably, also the sparsest solution to that system. This sparsity-seeking property is of interest in signal processing and information transmission. However, general-purpose optimizers are much too slow for lscr1 minimization in many large-scale applications.In this paper, the Homotopy method, originally proposed by Osborne et al. and Efron et al., is applied to the underdetermined lscr1-minimization problem min parxpar1 subject to y=Ax. Homotopy is shown to run much more rapidly than general-purpose LP solvers when sufficient sparsity is present. Indeed, the method often has the following k-step solution property: if the underlying solution has only k nonzeros, the Homotopy method reaches that solution in only k iterative steps. This k-step solution property is demonstrated for several ensembles of matrices, including incoherent matrices, uniform spherical matrices, and partial orthogonal matrices. These results imply that Homotopy may be used to rapidly decode error-correcting codes in a stylized communication system with a computational budget constraint. The approach also sheds light on the evident parallelism in results on lscr1 minimization and orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP), and aids in explaining the inherent relations between Homotopy, least angle regression (LARS), OMP, and polytope faces pursuit.

[1]  N. Sloane,et al.  Hadamard transform optics , 1979 .

[2]  William L. Briggs,et al.  The DFT : An Owner's Manual for the Discrete Fourier Transform , 1987 .

[3]  B. Logan,et al.  Signal recovery and the large sieve , 1992 .

[4]  P. Schmieder,et al.  Application of nonlinear sampling schemes to COSY-type spectra , 1993, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[5]  P. Schmieder,et al.  Improved resolution in triple-resonance spectra by nonlinear sampling in the constant-time domain , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[6]  David L. Donoho,et al.  WaveLab and Reproducible Research , 1995 .

[7]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[8]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[9]  Alan S. Stern,et al.  NMR Data Processing , 1996 .

[10]  S. Mallat,et al.  Adaptive greedy approximations , 1997 .

[11]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  M. R. Osborne,et al.  On the LASSO and its Dual , 2000 .

[13]  M. R. Osborne,et al.  A new approach to variable selection in least squares problems , 2000 .

[14]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Michael Elad,et al.  A generalized uncertainty principle and sparse representation in pairs of bases , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  Sudipto Guha,et al.  Near-optimal sparse fourier representations via sampling , 2002, STOC '02.

[17]  S. Vasanawala,et al.  3 D Fluid-Suppressed T 2-Prep Flow-Independent Angiography using Balanced SSFP , 2002 .

[18]  Peter Hawkes,et al.  Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics , 2002 .

[19]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  I. Daubechies,et al.  An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint , 2003, math/0307152.

[21]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  GRASSMANNIAN FRAMES WITH APPLICATIONS TO CODING AND COMMUNICATION , 2003, math/0301135.

[22]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Image decomposition: separation of texture from piecewise smooth content , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[23]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Sparse representations in unions of bases , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[25]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[26]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[27]  Jean-Jacques Fuchs,et al.  On sparse representations in arbitrary redundant bases , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  D. Donoho,et al.  Redundant Multiscale Transforms and Their Application for Morphological Component Separation , 2004 .

[29]  J. Tropp JUST RELAX: CONVEX PROGRAMMING METHODS FOR SUBSET SELECTION AND SPARSE APPROXIMATION , 2004 .

[30]  Mark D. Plumbley Geometry and homotopy for l 1 sparse representations , 2005 .

[31]  David L. Donoho,et al.  Neighborly Polytopes And Sparse Solution Of Underdetermined Linear Equations , 2005 .

[32]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[33]  Michael Elad,et al.  Submitted to Ieee Transactions on Image Processing Image Decomposition via the Combination of Sparse Representations and a Variational Approach , 2022 .

[34]  J. Tropp,et al.  SIGNAL RECOVERY FROM PARTIAL INFORMATION VIA ORTHOGONAL MATCHING PURSUIT , 2005 .

[35]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Signal recovery from random projections , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[36]  Justin Romberg,et al.  Practical Signal Recovery from Random Projections , 2005 .

[37]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[38]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  Homotopy continuation for sparse signal representation , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[39]  M. Rudelson,et al.  Geometric approach to error-correcting codes and reconstruction of signals , 2005, math/0502299.

[40]  D. Donoho,et al.  Counting faces of randomly-projected polytopes when the projection radically lowers dimension , 2006, math/0607364.

[41]  Yaakov Tsaig,et al.  Extensions of compressed sensing , 2006, Signal Process..

[42]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[43]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of equations, the minimal 𝓁1‐norm near‐solution approximates the sparsest near‐solution , 2006 .

[44]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[45]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[46]  A. Banerjee Convex Analysis and Optimization , 2006 .

[47]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Just relax: convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[48]  David L. Donoho,et al.  Sparse Solution Of Underdetermined Linear Equations By Stagewise Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2006 .

[49]  David L. Donoho,et al.  High-Dimensional Centrally Symmetric Polytopes with Neighborliness Proportional to Dimension , 2006, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[50]  Yaakov Tsaig,et al.  Breakdown of equivalence between the minimal l1-norm solution and the sparsest solution , 2006, Signal Process..

[51]  Mark D. Plumbley Recovery of Sparse Representations by Polytope Faces Pursuit , 2006, ICA.

[52]  David L. Donoho,et al.  Solution of l1Minimization Problems by LARS/Homotopy Methods , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[53]  R. Gribonval,et al.  Highly sparse representations from dictionaries are unique and independent of the sparseness measure , 2007 .

[54]  Michael Elad,et al.  Coordinate and subspace optimization methods for linear least squares with non-quadratic regularization , 2007 .

[55]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.