Compressed wavefield extrapolation

An explicit algorithm for the extrapolation of one-way wavefields is proposed that combines recent developments in information theory and theoretical signal processing with the physics of wave propagation. Because of excessive memory requirements, explicit formulations for wave propagation have proven to be a challenge in 3D. By using ideas from compressed sensing, we are able to formulate the (inverse) wavefield extrapolation problem on small subsets of the data volume, thereby reducing the size of the operators. Compressed sensing entails a new paradigm for signal recovery that provides conditions under which signals can be recovered from incomplete samplings by nonlinear recovery methods that promote sparsity of the to-be-recovered signal. According to this theory, signals can be successfully recovered when the measurement basis is incoherent with the representation in which the wavefield is sparse. In this new approach, the eigenfunctions of the Helmholtz operator are recognized as a basis that is incoherent with curvelets that are known to compress seismic wavefields. By casting the wavefield extrapolation problem in this framework, wavefields can be successfully extrapolated in the modal domain, despite evanescent wave modes. The degree to which the wavefield can be recovered depends on the number of missing (evanescent) wavemodes and on the complexity of the wavefield. A proof of principle for the compressed sensing method is given for inverse wavefield extrapolation in 2D, together with a pathway to 3D during which the multiscale and multiangular properties of curvelets, in relation to the Helmholz operator, are exploited. The results show that our method is stable, has reduced dip limitations, and handles evanescent waves in inverse extrapolation.

[1]  J. Claerbout Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping , 1971 .

[2]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Robust Modeling With Erratic Data , 1973 .

[3]  H. L. Taylor,et al.  Deconvolution with the l 1 norm , 1979 .

[4]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wave Field Extrapolation , 1980 .

[5]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Wavelet estimation and deconvolution , 1981 .

[6]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  LSQR: An Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares , 1982, TOMS.

[7]  T. Ulrych,et al.  Analytic minimum entropy deconvolution , 1982 .

[8]  F. Santosa,et al.  Linear inversion of ban limit reflection seismograms , 1986 .

[9]  J. Wang,et al.  Subsurface imaging using magnetotelluric data , 1988 .

[10]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  Split-Step Fourier Migration , 1990 .

[11]  Imaging salt with turning seismic waves , 1992 .

[12]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Minimum entropy deconvolution with frequency-domain constraints , 1994 .

[13]  Patrick Joly,et al.  Splitting of Operators, Alternate Directions, and Paraxial Approximations for the Three-Dimensional Wave Equation , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Estimation of the discrete Fourier transform, a linear inversion approach , 1996 .

[15]  F. J. Dessing,et al.  A wavelet transform approach to seismic processing , 1997 .

[16]  Hart F. Smith A Hardy space for Fourier integral operators , 1998 .

[17]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Modal expansion of one‐way operators in laterally varying media , 1998 .

[18]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[19]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Interpolation and extrapolation using a high-resolution discrete Fourier transform , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[20]  E. Candès,et al.  Curvelets: A Surprisingly Effective Nonadaptive Representation for Objects with Edges , 2000 .

[21]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Generalization of the phase-screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves , 2000 .

[22]  E. Candès,et al.  Recovering edges in ill-posed inverse problems: optimality of curvelet frames , 2002 .

[23]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[24]  I. Daubechies,et al.  An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint , 2003, math/0307152.

[25]  René-Édouard Plessix,et al.  How to choose a subset of frequencies in frequency-domain finite-difference migration , 2004 .

[26]  A. Guitton,et al.  Adaptive subtraction of multiples using the L1‐norm , 2004 .

[27]  R. Plessix,et al.  Frequency-domain finite-difference amplitude-preserving migration , 2004 .

[28]  E. Candès,et al.  New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities , 2004 .

[29]  Mi Lu,et al.  Accelerating seismic migration using FPGA-based coprocessor platform , 2004, 12th Annual IEEE Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines.

[30]  E. Candès,et al.  The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse , 2004, math/0407210.

[31]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[32]  D. Donoho,et al.  Simultaneous cartoon and texture image inpainting using morphological component analysis (MCA) , 2005 .

[33]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Seismic denoising with nonuniformly sampled curvelets , 2006, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[34]  Yaakov Tsaig,et al.  Extensions of compressed sensing , 2006, Signal Process..

[35]  Hervé Chauris,et al.  Seismic imaging in the curvelet domain and its implications for the curvelet design , 2006 .

[36]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[37]  Cornelis Vuik,et al.  A new iterative solver for the time-harmonic wave equation , 2006 .

[38]  Huub Douma,et al.  Leading-order Seismic Imaging Using Curvelets , 2006 .

[39]  J. Gaiser,et al.  Characterization of layered anisotropic media from prestack PS-wave-reflection data , 2006 .

[40]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Application of Stable Signal Recovery to Seismic Data Interpolation , 2006 .

[41]  A. Gisolf,et al.  Fourier reconstruction of marine-streamer data in four spatial coordinates , 2006 .

[42]  Changsoo Shin,et al.  Two-way Vs One-way: A Case Study Style Comparison , 2006 .

[43]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Non-linear primary-multiple separation with directional curvelet frames , 2007 .

[44]  Huub Douma,et al.  Leading-order seismic imaging using curvelets , 2007 .