Computational role of eccentricity dependent cortical magnification

We develop a sampling extension of M-theory focused on invariance to scale and translation. Quite surprisingly, the theory predicts an architecture of early vision with increasing receptive field sizes and a high resolution fovea ‐ in agreement with data about the cortical magnification factor, V1 and the retina. From the slope of the inverse of the magnification factor, M-theory predicts a cortical “fovea” in V1 in the order of 40 by 40 basic units at each receptive field size ‐ corresponding to a foveola of size around 26 minutes of arc at the highest resolution, 6 degrees at the lowest resolution. It also predicts uniform scale invariance over a fixed range of scales independently of eccentricity, while translation invariance should depend linearly on spatial frequency. ≈ (B)

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[3]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  D. Marr,et al.  Smallest channel in early human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  C. Gross,et al.  Visual topography of V2 in the macaque , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Vogels,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1 , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Diagnostic use of scale information for componential and holistic recognition. , 2003 .

[12]  A. Cowey,et al.  Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A Theory of Object Recognition: Computations and Circuits in the Feedforward Path of the Ventral Stream in Primate Visual Cortex , 2005 .

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Metamers of the ventral stream , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[16]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.