Evolving artificial neural networks for screening features from mammograms

Disagreement or inconsistencies in mammographic interpretation motivates utilizing computerized pattern recognition algorithms to aid the assessment of radiographic features. We have studied the potential for using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to analyze interpreted radiographic features from film screen mammograms. Attention was given to 216 cases (mammogram series) that presented suspicious characteristics. The domain expert (Wasson) quantified up to 12 radiographic features for each case based on guidelines from previous literature. Patient age was also included. The existence or absence of malignancy was confirmed in each case via open surgical biopsy (111 malignant, 105 benign). ANNs of various complexity were trained via evolutionary programming to indicate whether or not a malignancy was present given a vector of scored input features in a statistical cross validation procedure. For suspicious masses, the best evolved ANNs generated a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AZ) of 0.9196 +/- 0.0040 (1 S.E.), with a mean specificity of 0.6269 +/- 0.0272 at 0.95 sensitivity. Results when microcalcifications were included were not quite as good (AZ = 0.8464), however, ANNs with only two hidden nodes performed as well as more complex ANNs and better than ANNs with only one hidden node. The performance of the evolved ANNs was comparable to prior literature, but with an order of magnitude less complexity. The success of small ANNs in diagnosing breast cancer offers the promise that suitable explanations for the ANN's behavior can be induced, leading to a greater acceptance by physicians.

[1]  B S Monsees Assessment of the recent consensus development panel on screening women aged 40-49 for breast cancer. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  T. Tong,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1993 , 1993, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary computation: Toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence , 1997, Complex..

[4]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[5]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary computation: comments on the history and current state , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[6]  David B. Fogel,et al.  Evolutionary Computation: Towards a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence , 1995 .

[7]  Hiroyuki Shinbata,et al.  Application of Image Analysis and Neural Networks to the Pathology Diagnosis of Intraductal Proliferative Lesions of the Breast , 1997, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[8]  B Angus,et al.  The detection of nodal metastasis in breast cancer using neural network techniques , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[9]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  C. Floyd,et al.  Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network , 1994, Cancer.

[11]  C E Floyd,et al.  Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. , 1997, Radiology.

[12]  C. E. Kahn Decision aids in radiology. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[13]  D B Fogel,et al.  Evolving neural networks for detecting breast cancer. , 1995, Cancer letters.

[14]  F. Girosi,et al.  Networks for approximation and learning , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  Peter R. Innocent,et al.  Determining and classifying the region of interest in ultrasonic images of the breast using neural networks , 1996, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[16]  Y. Wu,et al.  Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1993, Radiology.