Long Term Memory for Noise: Evidence of Robust Encoding of Very Short Temporal Acoustic Patterns

Recent research has demonstrated that humans are able to implicitly encode and retain repeating patterns in meaningless auditory noise. Our study aimed at testing the robustness of long-term implicit recognition memory for these learned patterns. Participants performed a cyclic/non-cyclic discrimination task, during which they were presented with either 1-s cyclic noises (CNs) (the two halves of the noise were identical) or 1-s plain random noises (Ns). Among CNs and Ns presented once, target CNs were implicitly presented multiple times within a block, and implicit recognition of these target CNs was tested 4 weeks later using a similar cyclic/non-cyclic discrimination task. Furthermore, robustness of implicit recognition memory was tested by presenting participants with looped (shifting the origin) and scrambled (chopping sounds into 10− and 20-ms bits before shuffling) versions of the target CNs. We found that participants had robust implicit recognition memory for learned noise patterns after 4 weeks, right from the first presentation. Additionally, this memory was remarkably resistant to acoustic transformations, such as looping and scrambling of the sounds. Finally, implicit recognition of sounds was dependent on participant's discrimination performance during learning. Our findings suggest that meaningless temporal features as short as 10 ms can be implicitly stored in long-term auditory memory. Moreover, successful encoding and storage of such fine features may vary between participants, possibly depending on individual attention and auditory discrimination abilities. Significance Statement Meaningless auditory patterns could be implicitly encoded and stored in long-term memory. Acoustic transformations of learned meaningless patterns could be implicitly recognized after 4 weeks. Implicit long-term memories can be formed for meaningless auditory features as short as 10 ms. Successful encoding and long-term implicit recognition of meaningless patterns may strongly depend on individual attention and auditory discrimination abilities.

[1]  Trevor R. Agus,et al.  Perceptual Learning of Acoustic Noise Generates Memory-Evoked Potentials , 2015, Current Biology.

[2]  Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock,et al.  Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Accelerated long-term forgetting in aging and intra-sleep awakenings , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[4]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Neural Response Phase Tracks How Listeners Learn New Acoustic Representations , 2013, Current Biology.

[5]  David Poeppel,et al.  Cortical Oscillations in Auditory Perception and Speech: Evidence for Two Temporal Windows in Human Auditory Cortex , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[6]  Johan Willander,et al.  Development of a new Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[7]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  Rapid Formation of Robust Auditory Memories: Insights from Noise , 2010, Neuron.

[8]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  Going beyond LTM in the MTL: A synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Strengthening Individual Memories by Reactivating Them During Sleep , 2009, Science.

[10]  Timothée Masquelier,et al.  Competitive STDP-Based Spike Pattern Learning , 2009, Neural Computation.

[11]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity Finds the Start of Repeating Patterns in Continuous Spike Trains , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  M. Chun,et al.  Linking Implicit and Explicit Memory: Common Encoding Factors and Shared Representations , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Sleep, memory, and plasticity. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  I. Winkler,et al.  From sensory to long-term memory: evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[15]  Christian Kaernbach,et al.  The memory of noise. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[16]  Gerardo Rojas-Piloni,et al.  Stochastic Resonance within the Somatosensory System: Effects of Noise on Evoked Field Potentials Elicited by Tactile Stimuli , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[18]  W. Singer,et al.  Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[20]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Temporal and spectral basis of the features perceived in repeated noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  C Kaernbach.  On the consistency of tapping to repeated noise. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  N. Cowan.  Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  B W Ellis,et al.  The St. Mary's Hospital sleep questionnaire: a study of reliability. , 1981, Sleep.

[24]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[25]  G. Sioles.  Effect of Sound Velocity on Reverberation Time , 1963 .

[26]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Lower Limits of Auditory Periodicity Analysis , 1963 .

[27]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[28]  C. Eastman.  MYLOSTOMID DENTAL PLATES. , 1909, Science.