Frog and Blade Based Branching Direction Detection in LiDAR Data

Train-borne localization plays an important role in future railway applications which require quick track-selective positioning. In this paper, a branching direction detection approach based on frog and blade is presented to address the ambiguity of which track is chosen when a turnout is passed. The reference positions (i.e. the tip of the blade and the tip of the frog) on turnouts are detected as well. Since track detection is the prerequisite, rail and track sections are extracted using an onboard LiDAR sensor considering features related to the rail profile and the longitudinal geometry. The relative position between the ego track and branching tracks are considered as track events, from which the branching directions are derived. The approach is evaluated with datasets collected in a railway test ground. The results demonstrate that the branching directions are detected accurately with a recall of 97.6% and a precision of 98.8%. Moreover, the proposed approach makes determination of the branching direction 22.4m and 16.4m earlier than the frog- or blade- based one does in facing and trailing directions respectively.

[1]  Martin Lauer,et al.  Track detection in 3D laser scanning data of railway infrastructure , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings.

[2]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Automated Visual Inspection of Railroad Tracks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Paul H. Lewis,et al.  An automated algorithm for extracting road edges from terrestrial mobile LiDAR data , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas Albrecht,et al.  A precise and reliable train positioning system and its use for automation of train operation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation Proceedings.

[5]  Bisheng Yang,et al.  Automated Extraction of 3-D Railway Tracks from Mobile Laser Scanning Point Clouds , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Christian Rahmig,et al.  Detecting Track Events with a Laser Scanner for using within a Modified Multi-Hypothesis Based Map-Matching Algorithm for Train Positioning , 2013 .

[7]  Julie Beugin,et al.  A Survey of GNSS-Based Research and Developments for the European Railway Signaling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Max Spindler,et al.  Model-based rail detection in mobile laser scanning data , 2016, 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[9]  Katrin Lüddecke,et al.  Evaluating multiple GNSS data in a multi-hypothesis based map-matching algorithm for train positioning , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[10]  S. J. Oude Elberink,et al.  RAIL TRACK DETECTION AND MODELLING IN MOBILE LASER SCANNER DATA , 2013 .

[11]  Max Spindler,et al.  An Analysis of Different Sensors for Turnout Detection for Train-borne Localization Systems , 2014 .

[12]  Ralph Ross Track and turnout detection in video-signals using probabilistic spline curves , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Carsten Hasberg,et al.  Probabilistic Rail Vehicle Localization With Eddy Current Sensors in Topological Maps , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Max Spindler,et al.  Rail detection using lidar sensors , 2016 .

[15]  Martin Lauer,et al.  A Train Localization Algorithm for Train Protection Systems of the Future , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Jürgen Wohlfeil Vision based rail track and switch recognition for self-localization of trains in a rail network , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).