Case Systems for Natural Language

Abstract In many languages (e.g. Latin, Greek, Russian, Turkish, German) the relationship of a noun phrase to the rest of a sentence is indicated by altered forms of the noun. The possible relationships are called (surface) “cases”. Because (1) it is difficult to specify semantic-free selection rules for the cases, and (2) related phenomena based on prepositions or word order appear in apparently case-less languages, many have argued that studies of cases should focus on meaning, i.e. on “deep cases”. Deep cases bear a close relationship to the modifiers of a concept. In fact, one could consider a deep case to be a special, or distinguishing, modifier. Several criteria for recognizing deep cases are considered here in the context of the problem of describing an event. Unfortunately, none of the criteria serves as a completely adequate decision procedure. A notion based on the context-dependent “importance” of a relation appears as useful as any rule for selecting deep cases. A representative sample of proposed case systems is examined. Issues such as surface versus deep versus conceptual levels of cases, and the efficiency of the representations implicit in a case system are also discussed.

[1]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantic description , 1969 .

[2]  Robert F. Simmons,et al.  Generating English discourse from semantic networks , 1972, CACM.

[3]  Allen Newell,et al.  How can Merlin understand , 1973 .

[4]  John Lyons,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics , 1971 .

[5]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[6]  Robert F. Simmons,et al.  A deductive question-answerer for natural language inference , 1970, CACM.

[7]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Types of Lexical Information , 1969 .

[8]  A.Willem De Groot Classification of the uses of a case illustrated on the genitive in Latin , 1956 .

[9]  Winfred P. Lehmann,et al.  On Earlier Stages of the Indo-European Nominal Inflection , 1958 .

[10]  Gary G. Hendrix,et al.  Language Processing Via Canonical Verbs and Semantic Models , 1973, IJCAI.

[11]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Active Semantic Networks as a Model of Human Memory , 1973, IJCAI.

[12]  D. G. Hays Dependency Theory: A Formalism and Some Observations , 1964 .

[13]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  The fourteen primitive actions and their inferences. , 1973 .

[14]  Terry Winograd,et al.  FRAME REPRESENTATIONS AND THE DECLARATIVE/PROCEDURAL CONTROVERSY , 1975 .

[15]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding , 1972 .

[16]  Bertram C. Bruce A Model for Temporal References and Its Application in a Question Answering Program , 1972, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Stuart C. Shapiro,et al.  A Net Structure for Semantic Information Storage, Deduction and Retrieval , 1971, IJCAI.

[18]  B. Nash-Webber,et al.  Semantic support for a speech understanding system , 1975 .

[19]  C. Fillmore TOWARD A MODERN THEORY OF CASE. , 1966 .

[20]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  l.Pak: A SNOBOL-Based Programming Language for Artificial Intelligence Applications , 1973, IJCAI.

[21]  Roger C. Schank Finding the Conceptual Content and Intention in an Utterance in Natural Language Conversation , 1971, IJCAI.

[22]  W. Diver,et al.  The System of Agency of the Latin Noun , 1964 .

[23]  Allan Collins,et al.  How to make a language user. , 1972 .

[24]  Bertram C. Bruce Case Structure Systems , 1973, IJCAI.

[25]  Allan M. Collins,et al.  Natural Semantics in Artificial Intelligence , 1973, IJCAI.

[26]  William A. Woods,et al.  Computational Linguistics Transition Network Grammars for Natural Language Analysis , 2022 .

[27]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  MARGIE: Memory Analysis Response Generation, and Inference on English , 1973, IJCAI.

[28]  Donald E. Walker Speech Understanding Research. Annual Technical Report. , 1975 .

[29]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Memory, knowledge, and the answering of questions. , 1972 .

[30]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[31]  M. Halliday Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar , 1966, Journal of Linguistics.

[32]  Otto Jespersen,et al.  The Philosophy of Grammar , 1924 .