Schelling segregation in an open city: a kinetically constrained Blume-Emery-Griffiths spin-1 system.

In the 70s Schelling introduced a multiagent model to describe the segregation dynamics that may occur with individuals having only weak preferences for "similar" neighbors. Recently variants of this model have been discussed, in particular, with emphasis on the links with statistical physics models. Whereas these models consider a fixed number of agents moving on a lattice, here, we present a version allowing for exchanges with an external reservoir of agents. The density of agents is controlled by a parameter which can be viewed as measuring the attractiveness of the city lattice. This model is directly related to the zero-temperature dynamics of the Blume-Emery-Griffiths spin-1 model, with kinetic constraints. With a varying vacancy density, the dynamics with agents making deterministic decisions leads to a variety of "phases" whose main features are the characteristics of the interfaces between clusters of agents of different types. The domains of existence of each type of interface are obtained analytically as well as numerically. These interfaces may completely isolate the agents leading to another type of segregation as compared to what is observed in the original Schelling model, and we discuss its possible socioeconomic correlates.

[1]  A. Kirman,et al.  A physical analogue of the Schelling model , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M. Blume THEORY OF THE FIRST-ORDER MAGNETIC PHASE CHANGE IN UO$sub 2$ , 1966 .

[3]  N. Keyfitz Demography , 1986, Key Topics of Study.

[4]  Junfu Zhang,et al.  Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world , 2004 .

[5]  J. Luck,et al.  Metastability in zero-temperature dynamics: statistics of attractors , 2004, cond-mat/0412077.

[6]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[7]  M. Marchesi,et al.  Journal of economic behavior and organization: special issue on heterogeneous interacting agents in financial markets , 2002 .

[8]  Jean-Pierre Nadal,et al.  Phase diagram of a Schelling segregation model , 2009, 0903.4694.

[9]  William A. V. Clark,et al.  Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context , 1992, Demography.

[10]  Lee,et al.  Phase diagrams of the spin-1 Ising Blume-Emery-Griffiths model: Monte Carlo simulations. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[11]  B. Derrida,et al.  Non-trivial exponents in the zero temperature dynamics of the 1D Ising and Potts models , 1994 .

[12]  Pablo Jensen,et al.  Competition between collective and individual dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  N. Smelser,et al.  Annual Review of Sociology , 1975 .

[14]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[15]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  There Goes the Neighborhood: Racial, Ethnic, and Class Tensions in Four Chicago Neighborhoods and Their Meaning for America , 2007 .

[16]  Camille Z. Charles,et al.  The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation , 2003 .

[17]  A. Lipowski,et al.  Roughening transition in the Blume-Emery-Griffiths model , 1993 .

[18]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Ising, Schelling and self-organising segregation , 2007, physics/0701051.

[19]  Blume-Emery-Griffiths model on the square lattice with repulsive biquadratic coupling , 1996, cond-mat/9611159.

[20]  Dmitri Vainchtein,et al.  Schelling's Segregation Model: Parameters, Scaling, and Aggregation , 2007, 0711.2212.

[21]  V. J. Emery,et al.  Ising Model for the ? Transition and Phase Separation in He^{3}-He^{4} Mixtures , 1971 .