Combining fMRI Data and Neural Networks to Quantify Contextual Effects in the Brain

Does word meaning change according to the context? Although this hypothesis has existed for a long time, only recently it has become possible to test it based on neuroimaging. Embodiment theories of knowledge representation suggest that word meaning consist of a collection of attributes defined in terms of various neural systems. This approach represents an unlimited number of objects through weighted attributes and the weights may change in context. This paper aims at quantifying such dynamic meanings using computational modeling. A neural network is trained with backpropagation to map attribute-based representations to fMRI images of subjects reading everyday sentences. Backpropagation is then extended to the features, demonstrating how they change in different sentence contexts for the same word. Indeed, statistically significant changes occurred across similar contexts and across different subjects, quantifying for the first time how attribute weightings for the same word are modified by context. Such dynamic representations of meaning could be used in future natural language processing systems, allowing them to mirror human performance more accurately.

[1]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[3]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation , 2016, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[5]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[6]  Mario Aguilar,et al.  Predicting Neural Activity Patterns Associated with Sentences Using a Neurobiologically Motivated Model of Semantic Representation , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object perception and object naming in early development , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Mark A. Chevillet,et al.  Evaluating semantic models with word-sentence relatedness , 2016, ArXiv.

[10]  J. Binder In defense of abstract conceptual representations , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[11]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Natural Language Processing With Modular PDP Networks and Distributed Lexicon , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Rajeev D S Raizada,et al.  Multiple Regions of a Cortical Network Commonly Encode the Meaning of Words in Multiple Grammatical Positions of Read Sentences. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Curt Burgess,et al.  From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model , 1998 .

[15]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Show and tell: A neural image caption generator , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[16]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.