Managing escalation of collaboration processes in crisis mitigation situations

Processes for crisis mitigation must permit coordination flexibility and dynamic change to empower crisis mitigation coordinators and experts to deal with unexpected situations. However, such mitigation processes must also provide enough structure to prevent chaotic response and increase mitigation effectiveness. Such combination of structure and flexibility cannot be effectively supported by existing workflow or groupware technologies. In this paper, we introduce the Collaboration Management Infrastructure (CMI) and describe its capabilities for supporting crisis mitigation processes. CMI provides a comprehensive Collaboration Management Model (CMM) and a corresponding federated system. CMM supports process templates that provide the initial activities, control and data flow structure, and resources needed to start mitigating a variety of crisis situations. In the event of a crisis, the appropriate process template is selected and instantiated. Crisis mitigation is achieved by escalating the instantiated process template. Escalation involves selecting and adding new process templates, creating new activities, roles, and task forces as needed to deal with the current demands in the crisis, and delegating responsibilities to process participants and task forces. CMM provides advanced composable primitives that empower crisis mitigation coordinators and experts to escalate the process. We provide an overview of the implementation of a federated CMI system and discuss our initial experience with various applications in the area of crisis management.

[1]  Stefan Jablonski,et al.  A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems , 1999, WACC '99.

[2]  Rainer Unland,et al.  A FORMAL FOUNDATION OF THE SEMANTICS OF COMPLEX EVENTS IN ACTIVE DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[3]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Workflow Evolution , 1996, ER.

[4]  Hala Skaf-Molli,et al.  coo: a workflow operator to improve cooperation modeling in virtual processes , 1999, Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Research Issues on Data Engineering: Information Technology for Virtual Enterprises. RIDE-VE'99.

[5]  Reiner Siebert,et al.  An Open Architecture for Adaptive Workflow Management Systems , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[6]  Rainer Unland,et al.  On the semantics of complex events in active database management systems , 1999, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.99CB36337).

[7]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Providing customized process and situation awareness in the collaboration management infrastructure , 1999, Proceedings Fourth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. CoopIS 99 (Cat. No.PR00384).

[8]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Flexible modeling and execution of workflow activities , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Thorsten Löffeler,et al.  Support for exception handling through workflow management systems , 1998 .

[10]  Carlos Maltzahn,et al.  The Chautauqua workflow system , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Anthony R. Cassandra,et al.  The Complex Event Detection and Monitoring System , 1999 .

[12]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Managing Process and Service Fusion in Virtual Enterprises , 1999, Inf. Syst..

[13]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to infrastructure for automation , 1995 .

[14]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  A Taxonomy of Adaptive Workflow Management , 2002 .

[15]  Christoph Bussler,et al.  Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation , 1996 .

[16]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Managing Business Processes an an Information Resource , 1994, IBM Syst. J..