Simulation semantics can revitalize the formalization of meaning: Reply to comments on Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality

[1]  Luc Steels,et al.  Grounding symbols through evolutionary language games , 2002 .

[2]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[3]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Dynamically altering agent behaviors using natural language instructions , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[4]  Jerome Feldman,et al.  Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[5]  Gisela Redeker,et al.  Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology , 1999 .

[6]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework , 1999 .

[7]  Barbara H Partee.  Compositionality, context, and cognition: comment on "Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality" by J. Feldman. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[8]  J. Feldman,et al.  Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language , 2004, Brain and Language.

[9]  Michiel van Lambalgen,et al.  There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics , 2006 .

[10]  Luc Steels.  Does embodiment need to be pushed even further? Comment on "Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality" by J. Feldman. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[11]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  From Molecule to Metaphor - A Neural Theory of Language , 2006 .

[12]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Embodied compositionality: comment on "Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality" by J. Feldman. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[13]  James F Allen.  Compositionality, language and intention: commentary on "Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality" by J. Feldman. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.