A model observer based on human perception to quantify the detectability

In medical imaging, model observers such as the "Hotelling observer" and the "Non Prewhitening Matched Filter" have been proposed to detect objects in X-ray images. These models, based on decision theory, are applied over the entire image. In this paper, we developed a model that mimics some processes of human visual perception. The proposed model is locally applied on some particular areas that correspond to the salient areas of the object. By doing this, the model mimics the sequence of eye fixations that we make when we explore an image for example in order to detect an object. The study is divided into three parts: a psychophysical experiment to obtain human’s performance to detect various objects in noises, a theoretical part to develop the proposed model, and finally, a result part. During the experiment, several participants were asked to detect objects in noisy images using a free search task. The luminance contrast of objects was adaptively adjusted according to their responses to obtain a percentage of correct detection for each object of 50 %. The proposed model, based on decision theory, was applied locally on some areas of the image that has a size corresponding to the high visual acuity of foveal vision. Areas were chosen according to their high saliency values computed through a bio-inspired model of visual attention. For each area, our model returned a detectability index. By supposing statistical independence between areas, the local indexes are combined into a global detectability index. Results show that the proposed model fits the results of the psychophysical experiment and outperforms classical models of the literature.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  A. Burgess Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Ali Borji,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Formula for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[5]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[6]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Practical use of receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the performances of defect detection algorithms , 2008, J. Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  When viewing natural scenes, do abnormal colors impact on spatial or temporal parameters of eye movements? , 2012, Journal of vision.

[8]  H. Hotelling The Generalization of Student’s Ratio , 1931 .

[9]  A. Burgess Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  A Biologically-Inspired Visual Saliency Model to Test Different Strategies of Saccade Programming , 2009, BIOSTEC.

[11]  J. M. Vignolle,et al.  Creation of an artifact database and experimental measurement of their detectability thresholds in noises of different spectra, in the context of quality control of an x-ray imager , 2011, International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision.

[12]  J. Angela,et al.  The Ideal Psychometric Procedure , 1987 .

[13]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  A practical use of ROC analysis to assess the performances of defects detection algorithms , 2007, International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision.

[14]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .

[15]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  Kenneth E. Weaver,et al.  An Assortment Of Image Quality Indexes For Radiographic Film-Screen Combinations ---Can They Be Resolved? , 1972, Other Conferences.

[17]  C E Metz,et al.  Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.

[18]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Analyzing the effect of dose reduction on the detection of mammographic lesions using mathematical observer models , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[20]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.