Epsilon-constraint with an efficient cultured differential evolution

In this paper we present the use of a previously developed single-objective optimization approach, together with the ε-constraint method, to provide an approximation of the Pareto front in a multiobjective optimization problem. This approximation is usually very near of the true Pareto front, but its cost grows with the desired number of points in the output set. As an alternative, it is possible to generate only a few points, and execute a second phase which will generate intermediate points, to increase the size of the output set. We use a rough sets-based approach for this second phase, which is a very robust approach. The results of this two-phase approach are very competitive in hard multiobjective problems, and is less expensive than the ε-constraint method alone. This approach is very effective on hard multiobjective problems, where is able to find good approximations of the Pareto front with less funtion evaluations than other approaches, as the NSGA-II (against which is compared).

[1]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  Evaluation of the constraint method-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (CMEA) for a three-objective optimization problem , 2002 .

[3]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[4]  Kenneth V. Price,et al.  An introduction to differential evolution , 1999 .

[5]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Optimization with constraints using a cultured differential evolution approach , 2005, GECCO '05.

[6]  R. Reynolds AN INTRODUCTION TO CULTURAL ALGORITHMS , 2008 .

[7]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation) , 2006 .

[8]  L. Lasdon,et al.  On a bicriterion formation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization , 1971 .

[9]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Solving Hard Multiobjective Optimization Problems Using epsilon-Constraint with Cultured Differential Evolution , 2006, PPSN.

[10]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[11]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Towards estimating nadir objective vector using evolutionary approaches , 2006, GECCO.

[12]  Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  Evaluation of the Constraint Method-Based EvolutionaryAlgorithm ( CMEA ) for a Three-Obje tive OptimizationProblemSujay , 2007 .

[13]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  Constraint Method-Based Evolutionary Algorithm (CMEA) for Multiobjective Optimization , 2001, EMO.

[14]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[15]  Tatsuya Okabe Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: on the distribution of offspring in parameter and fitness space , 2004 .

[16]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[17]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Evaluation Of The Constraint Method-based Evolutionary Algorithm (CMEA) For A Three-objective Problem , 2002, GECCO.

[18]  Robert G. Reynolds,et al.  Knowledge-based solution to dynamic optimization problems using cultural algorithms , 2001 .

[19]  R. Lyndon While,et al.  A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  Minimal Sets of Quality Metrics , 2003, EMO.