A phenomenological model of visually evoked spike trains in cat geniculate nonlagged X-cells

The visual information that first-order cortical cells receive is contained in the visually evoked spike trains of geniculate relay cells. To address functional issues such as the ON/OFF structure of visual cortical receptive fields with modelling studies, a geniculate cell model is needed where the spatial and temporal characteristics of the visual response are described quantitatively. We propose a model simulating the spike trains produced by cat geniculate nonlagged X-cells, based on a review of the electrophysiological literature. The level of description chosen is phenomenological, fitting the dynamics and amplitude of phasic and tonic responses, center/surround antagonism, surround excitatory responses, and the statistical properties of both spontaneous and visually evoked spike trains. The model, which has been constrained so as to reproduce the responses to centered light spots of expanding size and optimal light and dark annuli, predicts responses to thin and large bars flashed in various positions of the receptive field. The switching gamma renewal process method has been introduced for modelling spontaneous and visually evoked spike trains within the same mathematical framework. The statistical structure of the spike process is assumed to be more regular during phasic than tonic visual responses. On the whole, this model generates more realistic geniculate input to cortex than the currently used retinal models.

[1]  H. Barlow,et al.  MAINTAINED ACTIVITY IN THE CAT'S RETINA IN LIGHT AND DARKNESS , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Integrative action in the cat's lateral geniculate body , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  W. Levick,et al.  Statistical analysis of the dark discharge of lateral geniculate neurones , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  W. Levick,et al.  Maintained activity of lateral geniculate neurones in darkness , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R. W. Rodieck Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. , 1965, Vision research.

[6]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  H. Sakakura Spontaneous and evoked unitary activities of cat lateral geniculate neurons in sleep and wakefulness. , 1968, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[8]  W. Levick,et al.  Simultaneous recording of input and output of lateral geniculate neurones. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[9]  P. Hammond,et al.  The Purkinje shift in cat: extent of the mesopic range , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Stone,et al.  Relay of receptive-field properties in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  L Maffei,et al.  Retinogeniculate convergence and analysis of contrast. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of relay cells in cat's lateral geniculate nucleus: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  S. Murray Sherman,et al.  Electrophysiological classification of X- and Y-cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus , 1978, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Bullier,et al.  X and Y relay cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus: quantitative analysis of receptive-field properties and classification. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  E Kaplan,et al.  Effects of dark adaptation on spatial and temporal properties of receptive fields in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Effects of sleep and arousal on the processing of visual information in the cat , 1981, Nature.

[17]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Receptive field properties of X and Y cells in the cat retina derived from contrast sensitivity measurements , 1982, Vision Research.

[18]  K. Tanaka Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Mastronarde Correlated firing of cat retinal ganglion cells. I. Spontaneously active inputs to X- and Y-cells. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Adam M. Sillito,et al.  The influence of GABAergic inhibitory processes on the receptive field structure of X and Y cells in cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) , 1983, Brain Research.

[21]  J. Horton,et al.  Receptive field properties in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus in the absence of on-center retinal input , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  B. B. Lee,et al.  A comparison of visual responses of cat lateral geniculate nucleus neurones with those of ganglion cells afferent to them. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  M. Levine,et al.  The variability of the maintained discharge of cat dorsal lateral geniculate cells. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  S. Sherman,et al.  Synaptic circuits involving an individual retinogeniculate axon in the cat , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Functionally distinct groups of X‐cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  Christof Koch,et al.  Modeling the mammalian visual system , 1989 .

[27]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Spatial and temporal response properties of lagged and nonlagged cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  K. Kratz,et al.  Relationship between response latency and amplitude for ganglion and geniculate X- and Y-cells in the cat. , 1991, The International journal of neuroscience.

[29]  C. Koch,et al.  A detailed model of the primary visual pathway in the cat: comparison of afferent excitatory and intracortical inhibitory connection schemes for orientation selectivity , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  P Heggelund,et al.  The effect of contrast on the visual response of lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1992, Visual neuroscience.

[31]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Nonlagged relay cells and interneurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: Receptive-field properties and retinal inputs , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Sherman,et al.  Relative contributions of burst and tonic responses to the receptive field properties of lateral geniculate neurons in the cat. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Robson Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the patterns of retinal input to neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  P Heggelund,et al.  Response variability of single cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Comparison with retinal input and effect of brain stem stimulation. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Dynamics of neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: in vivo electrophysiology and computational modeling. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  W. Guido,et al.  Burst responses in thalamic relay cells of the awake behaving cat. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Pratik Mukherjee,et al.  Tailoring of variability in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  S. Sherman,et al.  Dual response modes in lateral geniculate neurons: Mechanisms and functions , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[40]  G. Orban,et al.  Model circuit of spiking neurons generating directional selectivity in simple cells. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  R. Reid,et al.  Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus , 1996, Nature.

[42]  J. Lisman Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[43]  M. Teich,et al.  Fractal character of the neural spike train in the visual system of the cat. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[44]  S. Sherman,et al.  Response latencies of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus are less variable during burst than tonic firing , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.