An Analysis of Different Sensors for Turnout Detection for Train-borne Localization Systems

Safe railway operation requires a reliable localization of trains in the railway network. Hence, this paper aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of train-borne localization systems proposed recently. Most of these approaches are based on a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and odometers. However, these systems turned out to have severe shortcomings concerning accuracy and availability. The authors believe that the ability to detect turnouts and the branching direction thereon is the most valuable clue for improvement. Knowing the branching direction provides topological information about the train position. Thus, it complements the geographical information of GNSS and the longitudinal position information of odometers in an ideal way. With such a sensor setup a track-selective localization would be possible even if GNSS is unavailable or disturbed. Therefore, this paper compares the individual benefits of different sensor principles for turnout detection such as inertial measurement units (IMUs), cameras, and lidar (light detection and ranging) sensors. As a consequence, the authors focus on lidar sensors. For those the authors define requirements, review the market, and report the results of a case study in a tramway scenario. The authors proved that it is possible to detect rails, turnouts, and platforms. Finally the authors discuss the findings intensively and give an outlook on further research.

[1]  Christian Rahmig,et al.  Tunnels and Bridges as Observable Landmarks within a Modified Multi-Hypothesis Based Map-Matching Algorithm for Train Positioning , 2012 .

[2]  L. Marradi,et al.  The RUNE project: the integrity performances of GNSS-based railway user navigation equipment , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, 2005..

[3]  Martin Lauer,et al.  Algorithms and concepts for an onboard train localization system for safety-relevant services , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation Proceedings.

[4]  Christian Rahmig,et al.  Detecting Track Events with a Laser Scanner for using within a Modified Multi-Hypothesis Based Map-Matching Algorithm for Train Positioning , 2013 .

[5]  Franz Mesch,et al.  EDDY CURRENT SENSOR SYSTEM FOR NON-CONTACT SPEED AND DISTANCE MEASUREMENT OF RAIL VEHICLES , 2000 .

[6]  Patrick Robertson,et al.  RailSLAM - Localization of rail vehicles and mapping of geometric railway tracks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  F. Puente Leon,et al.  Train-based Location By Detecting Rail Switches , 2000 .

[8]  Felix Schmid,et al.  Application of sensor fusion to railway systems , 1996, 1996 IEEE/SICE/RSJ International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (Cat. No.96TH8242).

[9]  Thomas Albrecht,et al.  A precise and reliable train positioning system and its use for automation of train operation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation Proceedings.

[10]  Z. Jiang,et al.  Digital route model aided integrated satellite navigationand low-cost inertial sensors for high-performancepositioning on the railways , 2011 .

[11]  A. Blug,et al.  Fast fiber coupled clearance profile scanner using real time 3D data processing with automatic rail detection , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004.

[12]  Carsten Hasberg,et al.  Probabilistic Rail Vehicle Localization With Eddy Current Sensors in Topological Maps , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.