Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis

We propose a novel application of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) to neural decoding: instead of just trying to figure out which stimulus was presented, we demonstrate how to explore the semantic relationships in the neural representation of large sets of stimuli. FCA provides a way of displaying and interpreting such relationships via concept lattices. We explore the effects of neural code sparsity on the lattice. We then analyze neurophysiological data from high-level visual cortical area STSa, using an exact Bayesian approach to construct the formal context needed by FCA. Prominent features of the resulting concept lattices are discussed, including hierarchical face representation and indications for a product-of-experts code in real neurons.

[1]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  D. Ringach Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Object category structure in response patterns of neuronal population in monkey inferior temporal cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Decoding visual inputs from multiple neurons in the human temporal lobe. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[7]  P. Földiák,et al.  Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[9]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Sparse coding in the primate cortex , 1998 .

[10]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[11]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[12]  Max Welling Donald,et al.  Products of Experts , 2007 .

[13]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  The `Ideal Homunculus': decoding neural population signals , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  The relative advantages of sparse versus distributed encoding for associative neuronal networks in the brain , 1990 .

[16]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Exact Bayesian bin classification: a fast alternative to Bayesian classification and its application to neural response analysis , 2008, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[17]  Rudolf Wille,et al.  A Triadic Approach to Formal Concept Analysis , 1995, ICCS.

[18]  Gerd Stumme,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: Foundations and Applications (Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence) , 2005 .

[19]  J. Gallant,et al.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Peter Földiák Sparse neural representation for semantic indexing , 2003 .

[21]  Uta Priss,et al.  Formal concept analysis in information science , 2006, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation for the determination of neural selectivity in area STSa. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[23]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Book Review , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Philippe Balbiani,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis, Foundations and Applications , 2005 .

[25]  D. Perrett,et al.  Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Dominik Endres,et al.  Bayesian and information-theoretic tools for neuroscience , 2006 .

[27]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations , 1998 .

[28]  Rudolf Wille,et al.  Restructuring Lattice Theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concepts , 2009, ICFCA.