On the Interaction of Selective Attention and Lexical Knowledge: A Connectionist Account of Neglect Dyslexia

Neglect dyslexia, a reading impairment acquired as a consequence of brain injury, is traditionally interpreted as a disturbance of selective attention. Patients with neglect dyslexia may ignore the left side of an open book, the beginning words of a line of text, or the beginning letters of a single word. These patients provide a rich but sometimes contradictory source of data regarding the locus of attentional selectivity. We have reconsidered the patient data within the framework of an existing connectionist model of word recognition and spatial attention. We show that the effects of damage to the model resemble the reading impairments observed in neglect dyslexia. In simulation experiments, we account for a broad spectrum of behaviors including the following: (1) when two noncontiguous stimuli are presented simultaneously, the contralesional stimulus is neglected (extinction); (2) explicit instructions to the patient can reduce the severity of neglect; (3) stimulus position in the visual field affects reading performance; (4) words are read much better than pronounceable nonwords; (5) the nature of error responses depends on the morphemic composition of the stimulus; and (6) extinction interacts with lexical knowledge (if two words are presented that form a compound, e.g., COW and BOY, the patient is more likely to report both than in a control condition, e.g., SUN and FLY). The convergence of findings from the neuropsychological research and the computational modeling sheds light on the role of attention in normal visuospatial processing, supporting a hybrid view of attentional selection that has properties of both early and late selection.

[1]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[2]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[3]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[4]  D. Norman Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .

[5]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[6]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[7]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[8]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[9]  M. Kinsbourne Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .

[11]  T. Carr,et al.  Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  T Shallice,et al.  Word-form dyslexia. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[15]  Geoffrey E. Hinton A Parallel Computation that Assigns Canonical Object-Based Frames of Reference , 1981, IJCAI.

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[19]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  E. Renzi Disorders of space exploration and cognition , 1982 .

[21]  E K Warrington,et al.  Neglect dysgraphia. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[24]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[25]  S Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual attention and stimulus identification. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Jenni A Ogden,et al.  Anterior-posterior interhemispheric differences in the loci of lesions producing visual hemineglect , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985 .

[29]  D. Perani,et al.  Unilateral neglect: Personal and extra-personal , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  M. Posner,et al.  Cueing Spatial Attention during Processing of Words and Letter Strings in Normals. Technical Report #2. , 1986 .

[31]  Mozer,et al.  Early parallel processing in reading: a connectionist approach. Technical report, April-November 1986 , 1986 .

[32]  B Caplan,et al.  Assessment of unilateral neglect: a new reading test. , 1987, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[33]  C. Butter Varieties of Attention and Disturbances of Attention: A Neuropsychological Analysis , 1987 .

[34]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[35]  L. Uhr Highly parallel, hierarchical, recognition cone perceptual structures , 1987 .

[36]  P. Smolensky On variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems , 1987 .

[37]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Disturbances in conceptual space involving language and speech. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  E. Làdavas,et al.  Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[40]  F. Michèl,et al.  Verbal visual extinction in right/left hemisphere lesion patients and the problem of lexical access , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Structures and Functions of Selective Attention. , 1987 .

[42]  D. Levine,et al.  Left visual spatial neglect is both environment‐centered and body‐centered , 1987, Neurology.

[43]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Disturbances in Spatial Attention Following Lesion or Disconnection of the Right Parietal Lobe , 1987 .

[44]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The perception of multiple objects: a parallel, distributed processing approach , 1987 .

[45]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Cognitive neuropsychology and language: The state of the art , 1988 .

[46]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Recognition of visual letter strings following injury to the posterior visual spatial attention system , 1988 .

[47]  K. Heilman,et al.  An experimental analysis of factors underlying neglect in line bisection. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[48]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Distributed Connectionist Production System , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[51]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. , 1988, Science.

[52]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Wickelphone ambiguity , 1988, Cognition.

[53]  Maureen Dennis,et al.  Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1988 .

[54]  D. Navon Attentional selection: Early, late, or neither? , 1989 .

[55]  M. Mozer Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989 .

[56]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connections and disconnections: Acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. , 1989 .

[57]  M. Mozer Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[59]  M. Mozer,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia. Two contrasting case studies. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[60]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[62]  M. Mozer,et al.  Perceptual and Conceptual Mechanisms in Neglect Dyslexia: Two Contrasting Case Studies , 1990 .

[63]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  The perception of multiple objects , 1991 .

[64]  É. Siéroff Perception of visual letter strings in a case of left neglect: Manipulation of the word form , 1991, Brain and Language.

[65]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[66]  T. Goldberg Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1992 .