On the Interaction of Selective Attention and Lexical Knowledge: A Connectionist Account of Neglect Dyslexia
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Deutsch. Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.
[2] J. Deutsch,et al. Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .
[3] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[4] D. Norman. Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .
[5] A. Treisman. Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.
[6] S. Jay Samuels,et al. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .
[7] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .
[8] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .
[9] M. Kinsbourne. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. , 1977, Advances in neurology.
[10] James L. McClelland,et al. The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .
[11] T. Carr,et al. Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] T Shallice,et al. Word-form dyslexia. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[14] M. Mesulam. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.
[15] Geoffrey E. Hinton. A Parallel Computation that Assigns Canonical Object-Based Frames of Reference , 1981, IJCAI.
[16] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[17] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.
[18] Leslie G. Ungerleider. Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .
[19] J J Hopfield,et al. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] E. Renzi. Disorders of space exploration and cognition , 1982 .
[21] E K Warrington,et al. Neglect dysgraphia. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[22] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.
[23] A. H. C. Heijden,et al. Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection , 1984, Memory & cognition.
[24] S Ullman,et al. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.
[25] S Grossberg,et al. Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] H. Pashler,et al. Visual attention and stimulus identification. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] Jenni A Ogden,et al. Anterior-posterior interhemispheric differences in the loci of lesions producing visual hemineglect , 1985, Brain and Cognition.
[28] Ennio Mingolla,et al. Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985 .
[29] D. Perani,et al. Unilateral neglect: Personal and extra-personal , 1986, Neuropsychologia.
[30] M. Posner,et al. Cueing Spatial Attention during Processing of Words and Letter Strings in Normals. Technical Report #2. , 1986 .
[31] Mozer,et al. Early parallel processing in reading: a connectionist approach. Technical report, April-November 1986 , 1986 .
[32] B Caplan,et al. Assessment of unilateral neglect: a new reading test. , 1987, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[33] C. Butter. Varieties of Attention and Disturbances of Attention: A Neuropsychological Analysis , 1987 .
[34] M. Coltheart,et al. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .
[35] L. Uhr. Highly parallel, hierarchical, recognition cone perceptual structures , 1987 .
[36] P. Smolensky. On variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems , 1987 .
[37] M. Gazzaniga,et al. Disturbances in conceptual space involving language and speech. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[38] E. Làdavas,et al. Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[39] M. Kinsbourne. Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .
[40] F. Michèl,et al. Verbal visual extinction in right/left hemisphere lesion patients and the problem of lexical access , 1987, Neuropsychologia.
[41] Michael I. Posner,et al. Structures and Functions of Selective Attention. , 1987 .
[42] D. Levine,et al. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment‐centered and body‐centered , 1987, Neurology.
[43] M. Gazzaniga,et al. Disturbances in Spatial Attention Following Lesion or Disconnection of the Right Parietal Lobe , 1987 .
[44] Donald A. Norman,et al. The perception of multiple objects: a parallel, distributed processing approach , 1987 .
[45] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Cognitive neuropsychology and language: The state of the art , 1988 .
[46] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Recognition of visual letter strings following injury to the posterior visual spatial attention system , 1988 .
[47] K. Heilman,et al. An experimental analysis of factors underlying neglect in line bisection. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[48] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. A Distributed Connectionist Production System , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[49] Hans-Otto Karnath,et al. Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.
[50] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .
[51] M. Posner,et al. Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. , 1988, Science.
[52] Steven Pinker,et al. Wickelphone ambiguity , 1988, Cognition.
[53] Maureen Dennis,et al. Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1988 .
[54] D. Navon. Attentional selection: Early, late, or neither? , 1989 .
[55] M. Mozer. Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989 .
[56] James L. McClelland,et al. Connections and disconnections: Acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. , 1989 .
[57] M. Mozer. Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[58] D. LaBerge,et al. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .
[59] M. Mozer,et al. Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia. Two contrasting case studies. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[60] P. Carpenter,et al. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.
[61] M. Posner,et al. The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.
[62] M. Mozer,et al. Perceptual and Conceptual Mechanisms in Neglect Dyslexia: Two Contrasting Case Studies , 1990 .
[63] Michael C. Mozer,et al. The perception of multiple objects , 1991 .
[64] É. Siéroff. Perception of visual letter strings in a case of left neglect: Manipulation of the word form , 1991, Brain and Language.
[65] S. Rose. Selective attention , 1992, Nature.
[66] T. Goldberg. Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1992 .