Viewpoint and Pose in Body-Form Adaptation

Faces and bodies are complex structures, perception of which can play important roles in person identification and inference of emotional state. Face representations have been explored using behavioural adaptation: in particular, studies have shown that face aftereffects show relatively broad tuning for viewpoint, consistent with origin in a high-level structural descriptor far removed from the retinal image. Our goals were to determine first, if body aftereffects also showed a degree of viewpoint invariance, and second if they also showed pose invariance, given that changes in pose create even more dramatic changes in the 2-D retinal image. We used a 3-D model of the human body to generate headless body images, whose parameters could be varied to generate different body forms, viewpoints, and poses. In the first experiment, subjects adapted to varying viewpoints of either slim or heavy bodies in a neutral stance, followed by test stimuli that were all front-facing. In the second experiment, we used the same front-facing bodies in neutral stance as test stimuli, but compared adaptation from bodies in the same neutral stance to adaptation with the same bodies in different poses. We found that body aftereffects were obtained over substantial viewpoint changes, with no significant decline in aftereffect magnitude with increasing viewpoint difference between adapting and test images. Aftereffects also showed transfer across one change in pose but not across another. We conclude that body representations may have more viewpoint invariance than faces, and demonstrate at least some transfer across pose, consistent with a high-level structural description.

[1]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  Miao‐kun Sun Trends in cognitive sciences , 2012 .

[4]  Catherine L Reed,et al.  Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system , 2007, Brain Research.

[6]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  T. Andrews,et al.  The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  It doesn't matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Broadly tuned, view-specific coding of face shape: Opposing figural aftereffects can be induced in different views , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression , 2008, Brain Research.

[11]  G. Rhodes,et al.  View-Specific Coding of Face Shape , 2006 .

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Cerebral lateralization of face-selective and body-selective visual areas depends on handedness. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  I. Daum,et al.  Differences between perception of human faces and body shapes: Evidence from the composite illusion , 2011, Vision Research.

[15]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Adaptation to biological motion leads to a motion and a form aftereffect , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[17]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[18]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[19]  F. Fang,et al.  Transfer of the face viewpoint aftereffect from adaptation to different and inverted faces. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[20]  C. Benton,et al.  Viewpoint dependence in adaptation to facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[21]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Probing the Visual Representation of Faces With Adaptation , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Shape- and Pose-Invariant Correspondences Using Probabilistic Geodesic Surface Embedding , 2011, DAGM-Symposium.

[24]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  E. Rolls,et al.  View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Body dissatisfaction and the effects of perceptual exposure on body norms and ideals. , 2009, The International journal of eating disorders.

[27]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Galit Yovel,et al.  It's all in your head: why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  Neuropsychological mechanisms of visual face and body perception , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  It's all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? , 2010 .

[31]  T. Simpson,et al.  Vision Thresholds from Psychometric Analyses: Alternatives to Probit Analysis , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. , 2005, British Journal of Psychology.

[33]  B. Rossion Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[34]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  C. Gross,et al.  Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[37]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  About Turn , 2009, Psychological science.

[38]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[39]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body , 2001, Science.

[41]  J. Barton,et al.  The nature of upright and inverted face representations: An adaptation-transfer study of configuration , 2012, Cortex.

[42]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  G. Yovel,et al.  The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective not body-selective brain areas , 2010 .

[44]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation and face perception , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.