Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: familiarity and similarity effects.

Previous studies have demonstrated the existence of perceptual interactions in the processing of two-word displays such as SAND LANE. When postcued to report one of the two words, subjects often make migration errors, in that the report of the specified word includes a letter of the other word (e.g., LAND or SANE instead of SAND). We find that migrations depend on the abstract, structural similarity of the strings, but not on the physical similarity; on whether the strings are words; and on whether the possible migration responses are words. We also rule out an interpretation of migration errors that attributes them to a guessing strategy. Our findings are interpreted in terms of models in which both strings simultaneously access high-level structural knowledge, that is, knowledge about what sequences of letters fit together to form familiar wholes.

[1]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[2]  D. Norman Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .

[3]  Wayne A. Wickelgran Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. , 1969 .

[4]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[6]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Visual factors in word perception , 1973 .

[8]  G. E. Mackinnon,et al.  Selective reading: attention to the "unattended" lines. , 1973, Canadian journal of psychology.

[9]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[10]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[11]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Perception of Letters in Words: Seek Not and Ye Shall Find , 1974, Science.

[12]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Peripherally presented and unreported words may bias the perceived meaning of a centrally fixated homograph. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  L. Manelis The effect of meaningfulness in tachistoscopic word perception , 1974 .

[14]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[15]  W. Estes The Locus of Inferential and Perceptual Processes in Letter Identification. , 1975 .

[16]  K. T. Spoehr,et al.  The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. L. Mcclelland Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[19]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[20]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .

[22]  J. L. Mcclelland,et al.  Perception and masking of wholes and parts. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  N Weisstein,et al.  Line segments are perceived better in a coherent context than alone: An object-line effect in visual perception , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  D. Massaro,et al.  The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter and word recognition. , 1979, Acta psychologica.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structural factors in figure perception , 1979 .

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  G. McConkie,et al.  Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification , 1980 .

[30]  A J Parkin,et al.  On Knowing the Meaning of Words We are Unable to Report Confirmation of a Guessing Explanation* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  R. Ratcliff A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. , 1981 .

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[33]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[34]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron: A new algorithm for pattern recognition tolerant of deformations and shifts in position , 1982, Pattern Recognit..

[36]  M. Mozer Letter migration in word perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  H. Egeth,et al.  Is meaning implicated in illusory conjunctions? , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  James L. McClelland Putting Knowledge in its Place: A Scheme for Programming Parallel Processing Structures on the Fly , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  James L. McClelland The programmable blackboard model of reading , 1986 .

[41]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory words: the roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The perception of multiple objects: a parallel, distributed processing approach , 1987 .

[43]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .