Estimation of Depth and Length of Defects From Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements: Verification With Simulations, Experiments, and Pigging Data

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) method is the most widely used non-destructive testing techniques for detection and characterization of defects in product transmission pipelines. The maximum safe operating pressure is a crucial parameter in practice, which is predicted with respect to the length, width, and depth of defects. In a previous work, an algorithm is devised to detect and estimate the width of the defect based on MFL signals. In this paper, an efficient method based on axial MFL level contours is devised to estimate the length of the defect. This method uses the patterns of signal level contours in the region corresponding to the defect’s area. In addition, a Gaussian radial basis function neural network (NN) is trained to approximate the depth of the defect. The NN is fed with the estimated length, width, and signal peak-to-peak values, and the output of the network is the estimated depth. The proposed detection and estimation method is applied to MFL measurements to detect and determine the sizing of metal loss defects. The efficacy and accuracy of the proposed methods are examined through a rich set of sample defects that contains simulated defects, designed defects that are carved on a real pipe by milling, and actual pigging data validated by several dig up verifications. Obtained results confirm the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed depth and length estimation method along with the previously devised detection and width estimation methods, in characterization of metal loss defects.

[1]  Satish Udpa,et al.  Advanced signal processing of magnetic flux leakage data obtained from seamless gas pipeline , 2002 .

[2]  D. A. Slesarev,et al.  Data processing and representation in the MFL method for nondestructive testing , 2013, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing.

[3]  G. P. Srivastava,et al.  Empirical structure for characterizing metal loss defects from radial magnetic flux leakage signal , 2010 .

[4]  Kenzo Miya,et al.  Reconstruction of crack shapes from the MFLT signals by using a rapid forward solver and an optimization approach , 2002 .

[5]  Ping Wang,et al.  Defect Profile Estimation from Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal via Efficient Managing Particle Swarm Optimization , 2014, Sensors.

[6]  Gwan Soo Park,et al.  Analysis of the velocity-induced eddy current in MFL type NDT , 2004 .

[7]  Satish S. Udpa,et al.  Characterization of gas pipeline inspection signals using wavelet basis function neural networks , 2000 .

[9]  O. Nelles Nonlinear System Identification , 2001 .

[10]  Doo-Hyun Choi,et al.  Analysis and Depth Estimation of Complex Defects on the Underground Gas Pipelines , 2013 .

[11]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Detection of natural gas pipeline defects using magnetic flux leakage measurements , 2013, 2013 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE).

[12]  L. Udpa,et al.  Adaptive Wavelets for Characterizing Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals from Pipeline inspection , 2006, INTERMAG 2006 - IEEE International Magnetics Conference.

[13]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterisation , 2006 .

[14]  A C Bruno,et al.  Experimental verification of a finite element model used in a magnetic flux leakage inverse problem , 2005 .

[15]  Lalita Udpa,et al.  Electromagnetic NDE signal inversion by function-approximation neural networks , 2002 .

[16]  Tariq Khan,et al.  A Recursive Bayesian Estimation Method for Solving Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation Inverse Problems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  Doo-Hyun Choi,et al.  Defects detection of gas pipeline near the welds based on self quotient image and discrete cosine transform , 2016, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing.

[18]  Rajesh Keshwani Analysis of Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals of Instrumented Pipeline Inspection Gauge Using Finite Element Method , 2009 .

[19]  J. Reilly,et al.  Sizing of 3-D Arbitrary Defects Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[20]  C. Magele,et al.  Fast Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal Inversion for the Reconstruction of Arbitrary Defect Profiles in Steel Using Finite Elements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[21]  Ping Wang,et al.  Fast Estimation of Defect Profiles from the Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal Based on a Multi-Power Affine Projection Algorithm , 2014, Sensors.

[22]  Lynann Clapham,et al.  A model for magnetic flux leakage signal predictions , 2003 .

[23]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Pulsed magnetic flux leakage techniques for crack detection and characterisation , 2006 .

[24]  S. Koziel,et al.  A Space Mapping Methodology for Defect Characterization From Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[25]  G. Tian,et al.  Velocity effect analysis of dynamic magnetization in high speed magnetic flux leakage inspection , 2014 .

[26]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Defect detection and width estimation in natural gas pipelines using MFL signals , 2013, 2013 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[27]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Continuous reinforcement learning to robust fault tolerant control for a class of unknown nonlinear systems , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..