An interpretation and proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection.

Fisher's "Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection" has long caused controversy in population genetics theory. Viewed as a statement about the increase, or rate of increase, of mean fitness over time, it encounters difficulties with cases arising in a multi-locus system for which mean fitness can decrease. An interpretation of the theorem is put forward here which implies that it is correct as a mathematical statement, but of less biological value than was claimed by Fisher.

[1]  W. Ewens Mathematical Population Genetics , 1980 .

[2]  M. Kimura On the change of population fitness by natural selection2 3 , 1958, Heredity.

[3]  A. Edwards,et al.  Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection , 1967, Nature.

[4]  T. Nagylaki The evolution of one- and two-locus systems. II. , 1977, Genetics.

[5]  R. Fisher XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[6]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  AVERAGE EXCESS AND AVERAGE EFFECT OF A GENE SUBSTITUTION , 1941 .

[7]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[8]  E. Pollak With selection for fecundity the mean fitness does not necessarily increase. , 1978, Genetics.

[9]  G. Price Fisher's ‘fundamental theorem’ made clear , 1972, Annals of human genetics.

[10]  A Hastings,et al.  Stable cycling in discrete-time genetic models. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Kingman A mathematical problem in population genetics , 1961, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  Ethan Akin Hopf bifurcation in the two locus genetic model , 1983 .

[13]  Sir Ronald A. Fisher POLYMORPHISM AND NATURAL SELECTION , 1958 .

[14]  J. Crow,et al.  Population genetics history: a personal view. , 1987, Annual review of genetics.

[15]  S. Wright Surfaces of Selective Value Revisited , 1988, The American Naturalist.