Dummy Crash-Tests for the Evaluation of Rigid Human-Robot Impacts

The light-weight robots developed at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) are characterized by their low inertial properties, torque sensing in each joint and a load to weight ratio similar to humans. These properties qualify them for applications requiring high mobility and direct interaction with human users or uncertain environments. An essential requirement for such a robot is that it must under no circumstances pose a threat to the human operator. To actually quantify the potential injury risk emanating from the manipulator, impact test were carried out using standard automobile crash-test facilities at the ADAC. In our evaluation we focused on unexpected rigid frontal impacts, i.e. injuries caused by sharp edges are excluded. Several injury mechanisms and so called Severity Indices are evaluated and discussed with respect to their adaptability to physical humanrobotic interaction.

[1]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimal Mechanical/Control Design for Safe and Fast Robotics , 2004, ISER.

[2]  H. Mertz,et al.  HYBRID III STERNAL DEFLECTION ASSOCIATED WITH THORACIC INJURY SEVERITIES OF OCCUPANTS RESTRAINED WITH FORCE-LIMITING SHOULDER BELTS. FRONTAL CRASH SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE 90'S , 1991 .

[3]  D. Viano,et al.  Role of impact velocity and chest compression in thoracic injury. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Safety Evaluation Method of Design and Control for Human-Care Robots , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Playing it safe [human-friendly robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[6]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  Biomechanical Aspects of Head Injury , 1973 .

[7]  D. Viano,et al.  Thoracic Impact: A Viscous Tolerance Criterion , 1985 .

[8]  Alexander Zelinsky,et al.  Quantitative Safety Guarantees for Physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  A passivity based Cartesian impedance controller for flexible joint robots - part I: torque feedback and gravity compensation , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment , 1985 .

[13]  P. F. Gloyns,et al.  EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (EuroNCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL AND BIOMECHANICAL LIMITS , 1999 .

[14]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[15]  H. Mertz,et al.  HEAD INJURY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR FOREHEAD IMPACTS , 1996 .

[16]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact , 1975 .

[17]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  RESPONSE AND INJURY SEVERITY OF THE HEAD-NECK UNIT DURING A LOW VELOCITY HEAD IMPACT , 1997 .

[18]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Human Safety Mechanisms of Human-Friendly Robots: Passive Viscoelastic Trunk and Passively Movable Base , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[20]  Christoph Borst,et al.  A Humanoid Two-Arm System for Dexterous Manipulation , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[21]  D. Viano,et al.  The Viscous Criterion - Bases and Applications of an Injury Severity Index for Soft Tissues , 1986 .