Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA-ephrinA gradients, axon-axon interactions, and patterned activity.

The topographic projection of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons to mouse superior colliculus (SC) or chick optic tectum (OT) is formed in three phases: RGC axons overshoot their termination zone (TZ); they exhibit interstitial branching along the axon that is topographically biased for the correct location of their future TZ; and branches arborize preferentially at the TZ and the initial exuberant projection refines through axon and branch elimination to generate a precise retinotopic map. We present a computational model of map development that demonstrates that the countergradients of EphAs and ephrinAs in retina and the OT/SC and bidirectional repellent signaling between RGC axons and OT/SC cells are sufficient to direct an initial topographic bias in RGC axon branching. Our model also suggests that a proposed repellent action of EphAs/ephrinAs present on RGC branches and arbors added to that of EphAs/ephrinAs expressed by OT/SC cells is required to progressively restrict branching and arborization to topographically correct locations and eliminate axon overshoot. Simulations show that this molecular framework alone can develop considerable topographic order and refinement, including axon elimination, a feature not programmed into the model. Generating a refined map with a condensed TZ as in vivo requires an additional parameter that enhances branch formation along an RGC axon near sites that it has a higher branch density, and resembles an assumed role for patterned neural activity. The same computational model generates the phenotypes reported in ephrinA deficient mice and Isl2-EphA3 knockin mice. This modeling suggests that gradients of counter-repellents can establish a substantial degree of topographic order in the OT/SC, and that repellents present on RGC axon branches and arbors make a substantial contribution to map refinement. However, competitive interactions between RGC axons that enhance the probability of continued local branching are required to generate precise retinotopy.

[1]  R. Hunt,et al.  Retinotectal specificity: models and experiments in search of a mapping function. , 1980, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo , 1996, Cell.

[3]  F. Bonhoeffer,et al.  In vitro experiments on axon guidance demonstrating an anterior‐posterior gradient on the tectum. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Uwe Drescher,et al.  Ephrin-As as receptors in topographic projections , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  S. Henke-Fahle,et al.  Avoidance of posterior tectal membranes by temporal retinal axons. , 1987, Development.

[6]  W. Harris,et al.  The effects of eliminating impulse activity on the development of the retinotectal projection in salamanders , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Regulation of axial patterning of the retina and its topographic mapping in the brain , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  M. Yamagata,et al.  Visual projection map specified by topographic expression of transcription factors in the retina , 1996, Nature.

[9]  W. Wurst,et al.  A role for the EphA family in the topographic targeting of vomeronasal axons. , 2001, Development.

[10]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Functional Consequences of Coincident Expression of EphA Receptors and ephrin-A Ligands , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Rapid remodeling of retinal arbors in the tectum with and without blockade of synaptic transmission , 1994, Neuron.

[12]  J G Flanagan,et al.  The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  H. Baier,et al.  Axon guidance by gradients of a target-derived component. , 1992, Science.

[14]  H Honda,et al.  Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Eph family receptors and their ligands distribute in opposing gradients in the developing mouse retina. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[16]  J Walter,et al.  Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro. , 1987, Development.

[17]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  B. Rohrer,et al.  Development of the retinotectal projection in zebrafish embryos under TTX-induced neural-impulse blockade , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  C. Shatz,et al.  Competitive interactions between retinal ganglion cells during prenatal development. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[20]  T. Pawson,et al.  Nuk Controls Pathfinding of Commissural Axons in the Mammalian Central Nervous System , 1996, Cell.

[21]  Edward C. Cox,et al.  Biochemical characterization of a putative axonal guidance molecule of the chick visual system , 1990, Neuron.

[22]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Bifunctional action of ephrin-B1 as a repellent and attractant to control bidirectional branch extension in dorsal-ventral retinotopic mapping , 2003, Development.

[23]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor Signaling , 2000, Cell.

[24]  Jonas Frisén,et al.  Ephrin-A5 (AL-1/RAGS) Is Essential for Proper Retinal Axon Guidance and Topographic Mapping in the Mammalian Visual System , 1998, Neuron.

[25]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Molecular Development of Sensory Maps Representing Sights and Smells in the Brain , 1999, Cell.

[26]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF‐1 in guiding retinal axons , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[27]  W M Cowan,et al.  Topographic targeting errors in the retinocollicular projection and their elimination by selective ganglion cell death , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Edelman,et al.  Spatial signaling in the development and function of neural connections. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  D. O'Leary,et al.  EphB Forward Signaling Controls Directional Branch Extension and Arborization Required for Dorsal-Ventral Retinotopic Mapping , 2002, Neuron.

[30]  S. Thanos,et al.  Fiber-fiber interaction and tectal cues influence the development of the chicken retinotectal projection. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Transmembrane Ligands for Eph Receptors , 1997, Science.

[32]  Richard Axel,et al.  Axonal Ephrin-As and Odorant Receptors Coordinate Determination of the Olfactory Sensory Map , 2003, Cell.

[33]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Inaccuracies in initial growth and arborization of chick retinotectal axons followed by course corrections and axon remodeling to develop topographic order , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Wong.  Retinal waves and visual system development. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Disturbance of refinement of retinotectal projection in chick embryos by tetrodotoxin and grayanotoxin. , 1990, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[36]  T. Pawson,et al.  Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands , 1996, Nature.

[37]  M. Constantine-Paton,et al.  N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists disrupt the formation of a mammalian neural map. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of Eph receptors suggest multiple mechanisms in patterning of the visual system. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[39]  A. Gierer,et al.  How do retinal axons find their targets on the tectum? , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[40]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map , 1995, Cell.

[41]  T. McLaughlin,et al.  Topographic-Specific Axon Branching Controlled by Ephrin-As Is the Critical Event in Retinotectal Map Development , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Guidance and topographic stabilization of nasal chick retinal axons on target-derived components in vitro , 1993, Neuron.

[43]  C. Cepko,et al.  Two homeobox genes define the domain of EphA3 expression in the developing chick retina. , 2000, Development.

[44]  A Gierer,et al.  Model for the retino-tectal projection , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[45]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on optic axon branching and remodelling in vivo , 1995, Nature.

[46]  Alfred Gierer,et al.  Directional cues for growing axons forming the retinotectal projection , 1987 .

[47]  Franco Weth,et al.  Modulation of EphA Receptor Function by Coexpressed EphrinA Ligands on Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons , 1999, Neuron.

[48]  C. Malsburg,et al.  How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[49]  A. Flenniken,et al.  Eph Receptors and Ligands Comprise Two Major Specificity Subclasses and Are Reciprocally Compartmentalized during Embryogenesis , 1996, Neuron.

[50]  J Huf,et al.  Response of retinal ganglion cell axons to striped linear gradients of repellent guidance molecules. , 1998, Journal of neurobiology.

[51]  F. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Chromophore-assisted laser inactivation of a repulsive axonal guidance molecule , 1996, Current Biology.

[52]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Retinotopic Map Refinement Requires Spontaneous Retinal Waves during a Brief Critical Period of Development , 2003, Neuron.

[53]  John G. Flanagan,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Ephrin-A2 and Ephrin-A5 Shows Their Requirement in Multiple Aspects of Retinocollicular Mapping , 2000, Neuron.

[54]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographic Guidance Labels in a Sensory Projection to the Forebrain , 1998, Neuron.

[55]  J. Huai,et al.  An ephrin-A-dependent Signaling Pathway Controls Integrin Function and Is Linked to the Tyrosine Phosphorylation of a 120-kDa Protein* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  E. Debski,et al.  Activity-dependent mapping in the retinotectal projection , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Identification and cloning of ELF-1, a developmentally expressed ligand for the Mek4 and Sek receptor tyrosine kinases , 1994, Cell.

[58]  C. Holt,et al.  Topographic Mapping in Dorsoventral Axis of the Xenopus Retinotectal System Depends on Signaling through Ephrin-B Ligands , 2002, Neuron.

[59]  Friedrich Bonhoeffer,et al.  Position-dependent properties of retinal axons and their growth cones , 1985, Nature.

[60]  S. Cohen-Cory,et al.  BDNF Modulates, But Does Not Mediate, Activity-Dependent Branching and Remodeling of Optic Axon Arbors In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Dennis D.M. O'Leary,et al.  Responses of retinal axons in vivo and in vitro to position-encoding molecules in the embryonic superior colliculus , 1992, Neuron.

[62]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases , 1995, Cell.

[63]  W. Harris,et al.  Axonal pathfinding in the absence of normal pathways and impulse activity , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[64]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Retinotectal maps: molecules, models and misplaced data , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[65]  Matthias Mann,et al.  RGM is a repulsive guidance molecule for retinal axons , 2002, Nature.

[66]  T Pawson,et al.  Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. , 1994, Science.

[67]  R. Sperry.  CHEMOAFFINITY IN THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF NERVE FIBER PATTERNS AND CONNECTIONS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.