Two spatio-temporal decorrelation learning algorithms and their application to multichannel blind deconvolution

We present and compare two different spatio-temporal decorrelation learning algorithms for updating the weights of a linear feedforward network with FIR synapses (MIMO FIR filter). Both standard gradient and the natural gradient are employed to derive the spatio-temporal decorrelation algorithms. These two algorithms are applied to multichannel blind deconvolution task and their performance is compared. The rigorous derivation of algorithms and computer simulation results are presented.

[1]  Hui Luo,et al.  Direct blind separation of independent non-Gaussian signals with dynamic channels , 1998, 1998 Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and their Applications. Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8359).

[2]  Jean-François Cardoso,et al.  Equivariant adaptive source separation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  P. Loubaton,et al.  Adaptive blind separation of convolutive mixtures , 1995 .

[4]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Nonholonomic Orthogonal Learning Algorithms for Blind Source Separation , 2000, Neural Computation.

[5]  Yujiro Inouye,et al.  Blind Deconvolution of Multichannel Linear Time-Invariant Systems of Nonminimum Phase , 2018, Statistical Methods in Control & Signal Processing.

[6]  C. Papadias,et al.  A constant modulus algorithm for multiuser signal separation in presence of delay spread using antenna arrays , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[7]  S.C. Douglas,et al.  Multichannel blind deconvolution and equalization using the natural gradient , 1997, First IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications.

[8]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  A New Learning Algorithm for Blind Signal Separation , 1995, NIPS.

[9]  최승진.  Blind signal deconvolution by spatio-temporal decorrelation and demixing , 1997 .

[10]  Roland Gautier,et al.  Blind separation of convolutive mixtures using second and fourth order moments , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[11]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Independent component analysis, A new concept? , 1994, Signal Process..

[12]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Natural Gradient Works Efficiently in Learning , 1998, Neural Computation.

[13]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[14]  Jitendra K. Tugnait,et al.  Identification and deconvolution of multichannel linear non-Gaussian processes using higher order statistics and inverse filter criteria , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Blind equalization of SIMO channels via spatio-temporal anti-Hebbian learning rule , 1998, Neural Networks for Signal Processing VIII. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.98TH8378).

[16]  Inbar Fijalkow,et al.  A globally convergent approach for blind MIMO adaptive deconvolution , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[17]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Robust learning algorithm for blind separation of signals , 1994 .

[18]  Christian Jutten,et al.  Blind separation of sources, part I: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture , 1991, Signal Process..

[19]  Pierre Comon.  Independent component analysis - a new concept? signal processing , 1994 .

[20]  James L. Massey,et al.  Inverses of Linear Sequential Circuits , 1968, IEEE Transactions on Computers.