A Probabilistic Network Model of Population Responses

A central question in computational neuroscience concerns how the response properties of neural populations depend on the activity of neurons both within and outside the population. Various models contain different types and combinations of feedforward and recurrent connections. Each model can be characterized by the particular set of assumptions about what information underlies the population response, and these in turn are reflected in the model’s behavior. We propose that the population response is designed to preserve full information about the relevant dimension in the stimulus, which could be a single unambiguous value, a single ambiguous value, or more than one value. We design an objective based on preserving this information, and use it in training the weights in a model. Our results demonstrate that a combination of feedforward and recurrent connections can generate broadly information-preserving population responses in a network.

[1]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Shapley,et al.  New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Seeing multiple directions of motion—physiology and psychophysics , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  L. Abbott,et al.  A model of multiplicative neural responses in parietal cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  Recurrent Cortical Competition: Strengthen or Weaken? , 1999, NIPS.

[8]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Responses of Complex Cells in Area 17 of the Cat to Bi-vectorial Transparent Motion , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic Interpretation of Population Codes , 1996, Neural Computation.

[10]  K. Zhang,et al.  Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Földiák,et al.  The ‘Ideal Homunculus’: Statistical Inference from Neural Population Responses , 1993 .

[16]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Statistically Efficient Estimation Using Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[17]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Distributional Population Codes and Multiple Motion Models , 1998, NIPS.

[18]  T. Sanger,et al.  Probability density estimation for the interpretation of neural population codes. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Carandini,et al.  Predictions of a recurrent model of orientation selectivity , 1997, Vision Research.