Subsymbolic Computation Theory for the Human Intuitive Processor

The classic theory of computation initiated by Turing and his contemporaries provides a theory of effective procedures--algorithms that can be executed by the human mind, deploying cognitive processes constituting the conscious rule interpreter. The cognitive processes constituting the human intuitive processor potentially call for a different theory of computation. Assuming that important functions computed by the intuitive processor can be described abstractly as symbolic recursive functions and symbolic grammars, we ask which symbolic functions can be computed by the human intuitive processor, and how those functions are best specified--given that these functions must be computed using neural computation. Characterizing the automata of neural computation, we begin the construction of a class of recursive symbolic functions computable by these automata, and the construction of a class of neural networks that embody the grammars defining formal languages.

[1]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[2]  P. Smolensky On the proper treatment of connectionism , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[5]  Allen Newell,et al.  Physical Symbol Systems , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  P. Smolensky Symbolic functions from neural computation , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  W. Freeman Second Commentary: On the proper treatment of connectionism by Paul Smolensky (1988) - Neuromachismo Rekindled , 1989 .

[8]  He Jifeng,et al.  Advances in Computing Science — ASIAN 2000 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  A. Turing On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. , 1937 .

[10]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Optimization and Quantization in Gradient Symbol Systems: A Framework for Integrating the Continuous and the Discrete in Cognition , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  J. van Leeuwen,et al.  Alan Turing : His Work and Impact , 2014 .

[12]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic GrammarVolume I: Cognitive Architecture (Bradford Books) , 2006 .

[13]  Peter T. Saunders Alan Turing: His Work and Impact , 2013 .

[14]  Masahiro Kimoto,et al.  On Computable Tree Functions , 2000, ASIAN.

[15]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar (Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications). , 2006 .

[16]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[17]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[18]  ISCRETE OR CONTINUOUS COMPUTATION ? , 2011 .

[19]  A Prince,et al.  Optimality: From Neural Networks to Universal Grammar , 1997, Science.