A Determinantal Point Process Latent Variable Model for Inhibition in Neural Spiking Data

Point processes are popular models of neural spiking behavior as they provide a statistical distribution over temporal sequences of spikes and help to reveal the complexities underlying a series of recorded action potentials. However, the most common neural point process models, the Poisson process and the gamma renewal process, do not capture interactions and correlations that are critical to modeling populations of neurons. We develop a novel model based on a determinantal point process over latent embeddings of neurons that effectively captures and helps visualize complex inhibitory and competitive interaction. We show that this model is a natural extension of the popular generalized linear model to sets of interacting neurons. The model is extended to incorporate gain control or divisive normalization, and the modulation of neural spiking based on periodic phenomena. Applied to neural spike recordings from the rat hippocampus, we see that the model captures inhibitory relationships, a dichotomy of classes of neurons, and a periodic modulation by the theta rhythm known to be present in the data.

[1]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Oscillatory Coupling of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells and Interneurons in the Behaving Rat , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons , 2002 .

[3]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus , 2003, Nature.

[4]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[5]  E. S. Chornoboy,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  D. Brillinger Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Uri T Eden,et al.  A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  E. Brown Course 14 - Theory of Point Processes for Neural Systems , 2005 .

[9]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[10]  Y. Peres,et al.  Determinantal Processes and Independence , 2005, math/0503110.

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[12]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Theta Oscillations Provide Temporal Windows for Local Circuit Computation in the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Loop , 2009, Neuron.

[13]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[14]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Structured Determinantal Point Processes , 2010, NIPS.

[15]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Determinantal Point Processes for Machine Learning , 2012, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[16]  Ryan P. Adams,et al.  Priors for Diversity in Generative Latent Variable Models , 2012, NIPS.

[17]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Nystrom Approximation for Large-Scale Determinantal Processes , 2013, AISTATS.

[18]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Hunter,et al.  Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus , 2003 .