Improved step size adaptation for the MO-CMA-ES
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ingo Rechenberg,et al. Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution , 1973 .
[2] W. Vent,et al. Rechenberg, Ingo, Evolutionsstrategie — Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. 170 S. mit 36 Abb. Frommann‐Holzboog‐Verlag. Stuttgart 1973. Broschiert , 1975 .
[3] John E. Savage,et al. The Complexity of Computing , 1976 .
[4] Leslie G. Valiant,et al. The Complexity of Computing the Permanent , 1979, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[5] Lothar Thiele,et al. Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.
[6] Lothar Thiele,et al. Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.
[7] Nikolaus Hansen,et al. Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.
[8] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..
[9] Marco Laumanns,et al. Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).
[10] Petros Koumoutsakos,et al. Reducing the Time Complexity of the Derandomized Evolution Strategy with Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA-ES) , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.
[11] Marco Laumanns,et al. PISA: A Platform and Programming Language Independent Interface for Search Algorithms , 2003, EMO.
[12] Marco Laumanns,et al. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..
[13] Petros Koumoutsakos,et al. Learning probability distributions in continuous evolutionary algorithms – a comparative review , 2004, Natural Computing.
[14] R. Lyndon While,et al. A New Analysis of the LebMeasure Algorithm for Calculating Hypervolume , 2005, EMO.
[15] Janez Demsar,et al. Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[16] Christian Igel,et al. A computational efficient covariance matrix update and a (1+1)-CMA for evolution strategies , 2006, GECCO.
[17] Christian Igel,et al. Steady-State Selection and Efficient Covariance Matrix Update in the Multi-objective CMA-ES , 2007, EMO.
[18] Stefan Roth,et al. Covariance Matrix Adaptation for Multi-objective Optimization , 2007, Evolutionary Computation.
[19] Nicola Beume,et al. SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[20] S. García,et al. An Extension on "Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets" for all Pairwise Comparisons , 2008 .
[21] Nicola Beume,et al. Scalarization versus indicator-based selection in multi-objective CMA evolution strategies , 2008, 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).
[22] Francisco Herrera,et al. A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behaviour: a case study on the CEC’2005 Special Session on Real Parameter Optimization , 2009, J. Heuristics.
[23] N. Hansen,et al. Recombination for Learning Strategy Parameters in the MO-CMA-ES , 2009, EMO.
[24] C. Papadimitriou,et al. The Complexity of Computing a , 2009 .
[25] Christian Igel,et al. Efficient covariance matrix update for variable metric evolution strategies , 2009, Machine Learning.
[26] Nicola Beume,et al. S-Metric Calculation by Considering Dominated Hypervolume as Klee's Measure Problem , 2009, Evolutionary Computation.
[27] Tobias Friedrich,et al. Approximating the least hypervolume contributor: NP-hard in general, but fast in practice , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..