Generalized Coordinated Transaction Scheduling: A Market Approach to Seamless Interfaces

A generalization of the coordinated transaction scheduling (CTS)—the state-of-the-art interchange scheduling—is proposed. Referred to as generalized coordinated transaction scheduling (GCTS), the proposed approach addresses major seams issues of CTS: the ad hoc use of proxy buses, the presence of loop flow as a result of proxy bus approximation, and difficulties in dealing with multiple interfaces. By allowing market participants to submit bids across market boundaries, GCTS also generalizes the joint economic dispatch that achieves seamless interchange without market participants. It is shown that GCTS asymptotically achieves seamless interface under certain conditions. GCTS is also shown to be revenue adequate in that each regional market has a nonnegative net revenue that is equal to its congestion rent. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the quantitative improvement of the proposed approach.

[1]  Shmuel S. Oren Authority and Responsibility of the ISO: Objectives, Options and Tradeoffs , 1998 .

[2]  F. Zhao,et al.  A Marginal Equivalent Decomposition Method and Its Application to Multi-Area Optimal Power Flow Problems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  G. L. Viviani,et al.  Hierarchical Economic Dispatch for Piecewise Quadratic Cost Functions , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[4]  Lang Tong,et al.  Multi-proxy interchange scheduling under uncertainty , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[5]  Lang Tong,et al.  On Robust Tie-Line Scheduling in Multi-Area Power Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Lang Tong,et al.  Multi-Area Interchange Scheduling Under Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Lang Tong,et al.  Stochastic Interchange Scheduling in the Real-Time Electricity Market , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  A. Conejo,et al.  Multi-area coordinated decentralized DC optimal power flow , 1998 .

[9]  Lang Tong,et al.  Coordinated Multi-Area Economic Dispatch via Critical Region Projection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Distributed Consensus-Based Economic Dispatch With Transmission Losses , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  A decentralized solution to the DC-OPF of interconnected power systems , 2003 .

[12]  Bin Wang,et al.  Decentralized Multi-Area Dynamic Economic Dispatch Using Modified Generalized Benders Decomposition , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Coordinated interchange scheduling and opportunity cost payment: a market proposal to seams issues , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[14]  Tomaso Erseghe,et al.  Distributed Optimal Power Flow Using ADMM , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.