Insights into the behaviour of systems biology models from dynamic sensitivity and identifiability analysis: a case study of an NF-kappaB signalling pathway.

Mathematical modelling offers a variety of useful techniques to help in understanding the intrinsic behaviour of complex signal transduction networks. From the system engineering point of view, the dynamics of metabolic and signal transduction models can always be described by nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) following mass balance principles. Based on the state-space formulation, many methods from the area of automatic control can conveniently be applied to the modelling, analysis and design of cell networks. In the present study, dynamic sensitivity analysis is performed on a model of the IkappaB-NF-kappaB signal pathway system. Univariate analysis of the Euclidean-form overall sensitivities shows that only 8 out of the 64 parameters in the model have major influence on the nuclear NF-kappaB oscillations. The sensitivity matrix is then used to address correlation analysis, identifiability assessment and measurement set selection within the framework of least squares estimation and multivariate analysis. It is shown that certain pairs of parameters are exactly or highly correlated to each other in terms of their effects on the measured variables. The experimental design strategy provides guidance on which proteins should best be considered for measurement such that the unknown parameters can be estimated with the best statistical precision. The whole analysis scheme we describe provides efficient parameter estimation techniques for complex cell networks.

[1]  Herbert M Sauro,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of stoichiometric networks: an extension of metabolic control analysis to non-steady state trajectories. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Michael Karin,et al.  The IKK NF-κB system: a treasure trove for drug development , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  J A Jacquez,et al.  Parameter estimation: local identifiability of parameters. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  N. Perkins,et al.  Good cop, bad cop: the different faces of NF-κB , 2006, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[5]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  The simultaneous solution and sensitivity analysis of systems described by ordinary differential equations , 1988, TOMS.

[6]  D. Irvine,et al.  Efficient solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations expressed in S-system canonical form , 1990 .

[7]  L. Petzold,et al.  Numerical methods and software for sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic systems , 1986 .

[8]  Eberhard O Voit,et al.  Computation and analysis of time-dependent sensitivities in Generalized Mass Action systems. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Per Grove Thomsen,et al.  An ESDIRK method with sensitivity analysis capabilities , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  T. Turányi Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications , 1990 .

[11]  D. Fell Understanding the Control of Metabolism , 1996 .

[12]  Maria Rodriguez-Fernandez,et al.  A hybrid approach for efficient and robust parameter estimation in biochemical pathways. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[13]  F J Doyle,et al.  Model identification of signal transduction networks from data using a state regulator problem. , 2005, Systems biology.

[14]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Experimental Design in Systems Biology, Based on Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Using a Monte Carlo Method: A Case Study for the TNFα-Mediated NF-κ B Signal Transduction Pathway , 2003, Simul..

[15]  D S Broomhead,et al.  Synergistic control of oscillations in the NF-kappaB signalling pathway. , 2005, Systems biology.

[16]  R. Gaynor,et al.  Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer. , 2001, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[17]  F. Doyle,et al.  Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic regulatory networks: insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network. , 2003, Genome research.

[18]  R. J. Field,et al.  Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems , 1985 .

[19]  Joseph M. Calo,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics: Recent developments and computational comparisons , 1984 .

[20]  J. Jacquez,et al.  Numerical parameter identifiability and estimability: Integrating identifiability, estimability, and optimal sampling design , 1985 .

[21]  Andrew N. Hrymak,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for chemical process optimization , 1996 .

[22]  David W. Bacon,et al.  Mathematical Model and Parameter Estimation for Gas-Phase Ethylene Homopolymerization with Supported Metallocene Catalyst , 2005 .

[23]  James R. Johnson,et al.  Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[24]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Automated sensitivity analysis of stiff biochemical systems using a fourth-order adaptive step size Rosenbrock integration method. , 2006, Systems biology.

[25]  D B Kell,et al.  Metabolomics, machine learning and modelling: towards an understanding of the language of cells. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[26]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Simulation Methods for Optimal Experimental Design in Systems Biology , 2003, Simul..

[27]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[28]  Allan R. Brasier,et al.  Identification of Direct Genomic Targets Downstream of the Nuclear Factor-κB Transcription Factor Mediating Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  R. Schainker,et al.  On the statistical sensitivity analysis of models for chemical kinetics , 1975 .

[30]  David G Spiller,et al.  Multi-parameter analysis of the kinetics of NF-kappaB signalling and transcription in single living cells. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[31]  A.J.B. Cruickshank Oscillations and traveling waves in chemical systems: Edited by R. J. Field and M. Burger. Pp. 681. Wiley, Chichester. 1985. £98.30 , 1986 .

[32]  P. I. Barton,et al.  Efficient sensitivity analysis of large-scale differential-algebraic systems , 1997 .

[33]  W. E. Stewart,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of initial value problems with mixed odes and algebraic equations , 1985 .

[34]  David W. Bacon,et al.  Modeling Ethylene/Butene Copolymerization with Multi‐site Catalysts: Parameter Estimability and Experimental Design , 2003 .

[35]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  Metabolic control theory: its role in microbiology and biotechnology , 1986 .

[36]  Robert J. Gelinas,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of ordinary differential equation systems—A direct method , 1976 .

[37]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Mathematical model of NF- κB regulatory module , 2004 .

[38]  B. Ingalls A Frequency Domain Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Biochemical Networks , 2004 .

[39]  Michael J. Kurtz,et al.  Selection of model parameters for off-line parameter estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[40]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods , 2001 .

[41]  Ralf Takors,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for the reduction of complex metabolism models , 2004 .

[42]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of systems of differential and algebraic equations , 1985 .

[43]  P. Tak,et al.  NF-κB: a key role in inflammatory diseases , 2001 .