Concatenation Method for High-temporal Resolution SSVEP-BCI

Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals are generally non-stationary, however, nearly stationary brain responses, such as steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), can be recorded in response to repetitive stimuli. Although Fourier transform has precise resolution with long time windows (5 or 10 s for instance) to extract SSVEP response (1-100 Hz ranges), its resolution with shorter windows decreases due to the Heisenberg-Gabor uncertainty principle. Therefore, it is not easy to extract evoked responses such as SSVEP within short EEG epochs. This limits the information transfer rate of SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces. In order to circumvent this limitation, we concatenate EEG signals recorded simultaneously from different channels, and we Fourier analyze the resulting sequence. From this constructed signal, high frequency resolution can be obtained with time epochs as small as only 1 s, which improves SSVEPs classification. This method may be effective for high-speed brain computer interfaces (BCI).

[1]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  EEG windowed statistical wavelet scoring for evaluation and discrimination of muscular artifacts , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  A comparative study of synchrony measures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on EEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  N. Birbaumer Breaking the silence: brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[4]  N Kawabata,et al.  [Nonstationary spectrum analysis of the electroencephalogram]. , 1973, Iyo denshi to seitai kogaku. Japanese journal of medical electronics and biological engineering.

[5]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Wavelet Transform in the analysis of the frequency composition of evoked potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[6]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  EEG signal processing , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Rabab K Ward,et al.  A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain–computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[11]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  Neural networks - methodology and applications , 2005 .