A Computational Approach towards Visual Object Recognition at Taxonomic Levels of Concepts

It has been argued that concepts can be perceived at three main levels of abstraction. Generally, in a recognition system, object categories can be viewed at three levels of taxonomic hierarchy which are known as superordinate, basic, and subordinate levels. For instance, “horse” is a member of subordinate level which belongs to basic level of “animal” and superordinate level of “natural objects.” Our purpose in this study is to take an investigation into visual features at each taxonomic level. We first present a recognition tree which is more general in terms of inclusiveness with respect to visual representation of objects. Then we focus on visual feature definition, that is, how objects from the same conceptual category can be visually represented at each taxonomic level. For the first level we define global features based on frequency patterns to illustrate visual distinctions among artificial and natural. In contrast, our approach for the second level is based on shape descriptors which are defined by recruiting moment based representation. Finally, we show how conceptual knowledge can be utilized for visual feature definition in order to enhance recognition of subordinate categories.

[1]  David Marr,et al.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation , 1983 .

[2]  Charles Kemp,et al.  The discovery of structural form , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  J. F. Marques,et al.  The general/specific breakdown of semantic memory and the nature of superordinate knowledge: insights from superordinate and basic-level feature norms. , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[6]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .

[8]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[9]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  Kyongmo Koo,et al.  Natural / Man-Made Object Classification Based on Gabor Characteristics , 2005, CIVR.

[13]  D. Sperber Are folk taxonomies “memes”? , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Lisa M Oakes,et al.  Infants flexibly use different dimensions to categorize objects. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[15]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A Structural Account of Global and Local Processing , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[17]  Sami E. I. Baba,et al.  OBJECT CLASSIFICATION VIA GEOMETRICAL, ZERNIKE AND LEGENDRE MOMENTS , 2009 .

[18]  M. Arterberry,et al.  The development of object categorization in young children: hierarchical inclusiveness, age, perceptual attribute, and group versus individual analyses. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[19]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  One cow does not an animal make: young children can extend novel words at the superordinate level. , 2001, Child development.

[20]  Babak Nadjar Araabi,et al.  Unsupervised Categorization of Objects into Artificial and Natural Superordinate Classes Using Features from Low-Level Vision , 2013 .

[21]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  Ultra Rapid Object Categorization: Effects of Level, Animacy and Context , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  Gregory L Murphy,et al.  An apple is more than just a fruit: cross-classification in children's concepts. , 2003, Child Development.

[24]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Gunter Saake,et al.  Categorization of concerns: a categorical program comprehension model , 2011, PLATEAU '11.

[26]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning. , 2009, Psychological review.

[27]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[29]  E. Warrington Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[30]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .

[31]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[32]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[33]  Rao Xiuqin,et al.  Fruit shape classification based on Zernike moments , 2007 .

[34]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The natural/man-made distinction is made before basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing , 2010 .

[35]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Alireza Khotanzad,et al.  Invariant Image Recognition by Zernike Moments , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[37]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.