Pseudo-Lyapunov exponents and predictability of Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal network dynamics

We present a numerical analysis of the dynamics of all-to-all coupled Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) neuronal networks with Poisson spike inputs. It is important to point out that, since the dynamical vector of the system contains discontinuous variables, we propose a so-called pseudo-Lyapunov exponent adapted from the classical definition using only continuous dynamical variables, and apply it in our numerical investigation. The numerical results of the largest Lyapunov exponent using this new definition are consistent with the dynamical regimes of the network. Three typical dynamical regimes—asynchronous, chaotic and synchronous, are found as the synaptic coupling strength increases from weak to strong. We use the pseudo-Lyapunov exponent and the power spectrum analysis of voltage traces to characterize the types of the network behavior. In the nonchaotic (asynchronous or synchronous) dynamical regimes, i.e., the weak or strong coupling limits, the pseudo-Lyapunov exponent is negative and there is a good numerical convergence of the solution in the trajectory-wise sense by using our numerical methods. Consequently, in these regimes the evolution of neuronal networks is reliable. For the chaotic dynamical regime with an intermediate strong coupling, the pseudo-Lyapunov exponent is positive, and there is no numerical convergence of the solution and only statistical quantifications of the numerical results are reliable. Finally, we present numerical evidence that the value of pseudo-Lyapunov exponent coincides with that of the standard Lyapunov exponent for systems we have been able to examine.

[1]  Aaditya V. Rangan,et al.  Architectural and synaptic mechanisms underlying coherent spontaneous activity in V1. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Yi Sun,et al.  Library-based numerical reduction of the Hodgkin–Huxley neuron for network simulation , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[4]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Louis Tao,et al.  Efficient and Accurate Time-Stepping Schemes for Integrate-and-Fire Neuronal Networks , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[6]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[7]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[8]  Aaditya V. Rangan,et al.  Fast numerical methods for simulating large-scale integrate-and-fire neuronal networks , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[9]  P. H. Richter H. G. Schuster: Deterministic Chaos, An Introduction, VCH‐Verlagsgesellschaft—Physik Verlag, Weinheim 1985. 220 Seiten, Preis: DM 98,—. , 1986 .

[10]  K. Aihara,et al.  12. Chaotic oscillations and bifurcations in squid giant axons , 1986 .

[11]  Germán Mato,et al.  On Numerical Simulations of Integrate-and-Fire Neural Networks , 1998, Neural Computation.

[12]  P. Müller Calculation of Lyapunov exponents for dynamic systems with discontinuities , 1995 .

[13]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[14]  Kevin K. Lin,et al.  Entrainment and Chaos in a Pulse-Driven Hodgkin-Huxley Oscillator , 2005, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[15]  Leon O. Chua,et al.  Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems , 1989 .

[16]  F. A. Kröger Luminescence and absorption of zincsulfide, cadmiumsulfide and their solid solutions , 1940 .

[17]  O. Prospero-Garcia,et al.  Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons , 1995 .

[18]  Alain Destexhe,et al.  How much can we trust neural simulation strategies? , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[19]  Paolo Del Giudice,et al.  Efficient Event-Driven Simulation of Large Networks of Spiking Neurons and Dynamical Synapses , 2000, Neural Computation.

[20]  Khashayar Pakdaman,et al.  An Analysis of the Reliability Phenomenon in the FitzHugh-Nagumo Model , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  Aaditya V. Rangan,et al.  Modeling the spatiotemporal cortical activity associated with the line-motion illusion in primary visual cortex. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Christof Koch,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons (Computational Neuroscience Series) , 1998 .

[23]  David K. Campbell,et al.  Order from Chaos , 2020, History of Particle Theory.

[24]  R. Shapley,et al.  A neuronal network model of macaque primary visual cortex (V1): orientation selectivity and dynamics in the input layer 4Calpha. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Chaos and synchrony in a model of a hypercolumn in visual cortex , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[26]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Cellular and network mechanisms of slow oscillatory activity (<1 Hz) and wave propagations in a cortical network model. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  David K. Campbell,et al.  Resonance structure in kink-antikink interactions in φ4 theory , 1983 .

[28]  Hansel,et al.  Synchronization and computation in a chaotic neural network. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[29]  Michele Giugliano,et al.  Event-Driven Simulation of Spiking Neurons with , 2003 .

[30]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Chaos in the Hodgkin-Huxley Model , 2002, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[31]  E. Ott Chaos in Dynamical Systems: Contents , 1993 .