A signal-based approach to localization and navigation of autonomous compliant motion

Architectures for the execution of autonomous compliant motion (ACM) require modules for 6 degree-of-freedom localization, navigation and force control of robot manipulators. We review existing model- and signal-based approaches to ACM and present a solution for the synthesis of localization and navigation using sensorimotor signals recorded from human demonstration.

[1]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Computer and Robot Vision , 1991 .

[2]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Compliance and Force Control for Computer Controlled Manipulators , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Geir Hovland,et al.  Frequency-domain force measurements for discrete event contact recognition , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Ralf Koeppe,et al.  Sensorimotor compliant motion from geometric perception , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[5]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Teaching and learning of compliance using neural nets: representation and generation of nonlinear compliance , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Kinematic Models for Model-Based Compliant Motion in the Presence of Uncertainty , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  John J. Craig,et al.  Hybrid position/force control of manipulators , 1981 .

[8]  Brenan J. McCarragher,et al.  Force control command synthesis for assembly using a discrete event framework , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  Sensorimotor Skill Transfer of Compliant Motion , 2000 .

[10]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Direct teaching and automatic program generation for the hybrid control of robot manipulators , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  B. J. McCarragher,et al.  Qualitative Template Matching Using Dynamic Process Models for State Transition Recognition of Robotic Assembly , 1993 .

[12]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[13]  Pavan Sikka,et al.  Monitoring contact using clustering and discriminant functions , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Ralf Koeppe,et al.  Explicit force control for manipulators with active observers , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[15]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Peg-on-hole: a model based solution to peg and hole alignment , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Brenan J. McCarragher,et al.  Combining force and position measurements for the monitoring of robotic assembly , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[17]  Radu Horaud,et al.  An analytic solution for the perspective 4-point problem , 1989, Proceedings CVPR '89: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  Building elementary robot skills from human demonstration , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  The Discrete Event Modeling and Trajectory Planning of Robotic Assembly Tasks , 1995 .

[20]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  A systematic design procedure of force controllers for industrial robots , 2000 .

[21]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.