Generating Comfortable, Safe and Comprehensible Trajectories for Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic

While motion planning approaches for automated driving often focus on safety and mathematical optimality with respect to technical parameters, they barely consider convenience, perceived safety for the passenger and comprehensibility for other traffic participants. For automated driving in mixed traffic, however, this is key to reach public acceptance. In this paper, we revise the problem statement of motion planning in mixed traffic: Instead of largely simplifying the motion planning problem to a convex optimization problem, we keep a more complex probabilistic multi agent model and strive for a near optimal solution. We assume cooperation of other traffic participants, yet being aware of violations of this assumption. This approach yields solutions that are provably safe in all situations, and convenient and comprehensible in situations that are also unambiguous for humans. Thus, it outperforms existing approaches in mixed traffic scenarios, as we show in simulation.

[1]  Martin Lauer,et al.  CoInCar-Sim: An Open-Source Simulation Framework for Cooperatively Interacting Automobiles , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[2]  Julius Ziegler,et al.  The combinatorial aspect of motion planning: Maneuver variants in structured environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[3]  Christoph Stiller,et al.  Automated Driving in Uncertain Environments: Planning With Interaction and Uncertain Maneuver Prediction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[4]  S. Zucker,et al.  Toward Efficient Trajectory Planning: The Path-Velocity Decomposition , 1986 .

[5]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  Online Verification of Automated Road Vehicles Using Reachability Analysis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Cars , 2017, ArXiv.

[7]  Christoph Stiller,et al.  Towards Cooperative Motion Planning for Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic , 2017, ArXiv.

[8]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[9]  Wei Zhan,et al.  A non-conservatively defensive strategy for urban autonomous driving , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[10]  Hermann Winner,et al.  Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems , 2014 .

[11]  Julius Ziegler,et al.  Trajectory planning for Bertha — A local, continuous method , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[12]  Hermann Winner,et al.  Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[13]  Darius Burschka,et al.  Estimation of collective maneuvers through cooperative multi-agent planning , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[14]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  SPOT: A tool for set-based prediction of traffic participants , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[15]  Christoph Stiller,et al.  Assessing map-based maneuver hypotheses using probabilistic methods and evidence theory , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[16]  Julius Ziegler,et al.  Making Bertha Drive—An Autonomous Journey on a Historic Route , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[17]  Edmund Donges A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ACTIVE SAFETY IN ROAD TRAFFIC , 1999 .