Perspectives on Computational Models of Learning and Forgetting

Technological developments have spawned a range of educational software that strives to enhance learning through personalized adaptation. The success of these systems depends on how accurate the knowledge state of individual learners is modeled over time. Computer scientists have been at the forefront of development for these kinds of distributed learning systems and have primarily relied on data-driven algorithms to trace knowledge acquisition in noisy and complex learning domains. Meanwhile, research psychologists have primarily relied on data collected in controlled laboratory settings to develop and validate theory-driven computational models, but have not devoted much exploration to learning in naturalistic environments. The two fields have largely operated in parallel despite considerable overlap in goals. We argue that mutual benefits would result from identifying and implementing more accurate methods to model the temporal dynamics of learning and forgetting for individual learners. Here we discuss recent efforts in developing adaptive learning technologies to highlight the strengths and weaknesses inherent in the typical approaches of both fields. We argue that a closer collaboration between the educational machine learning/data mining and cognitive psychology communities would be a productive and exciting direction for adaptive learning system application to move in.

[1]  P. Kellman,et al.  A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Catherine H. Augustine,et al.  Making Summer Count: How Summer Programs Can Boost Children's Learning , 2011 .

[3]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[4]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[5]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Time and learning. , 1974 .

[6]  Glenn Gunzelmann,et al.  Using Prior Data to Inform Model Parameters in the Predictive Performance Equation , 2016, CogSci.

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Implications of the ACT-R Learning Theory: No Magic Bullets , 2000 .

[8]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Predicting and Improving Memory Retention: Psychological Theory Matters in the Big Data Era , 2016 .

[9]  Glenn Gunzelmann,et al.  Evaluating the Theoretic Adequacy and Applied Potential of Computational Models of the Spacing Effect. , 2018, Cognitive science.

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[11]  Kevin A. Gluck,et al.  Using Prior Data to Inform Initial Performance Predictions of Individual Students , 2017, CogSci.

[12]  Robert V. Lindsey,et al.  Improving Students’ Long-Term Knowledge Retention Through Personalized Review , 2014, Psychological science.

[13]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  Deploying a Model-based Adaptive Fact-Learning System in University Courses , 2018 .

[14]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  An Individual's Rate of Forgetting Is Stable Over Time but Differs Across Materials , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Forgetting of Foreign-Language Skills: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Online Tutoring Software , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Practice and Forgetting Effects on Vocabulary Memory: An Activation-Based Model of the Spacing Effect , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  M. Mozer,et al.  Discrete-Event Continuous-Time Recurrent Nets , 2017 .

[18]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect , 1993 .

[19]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Deep Knowledge Tracing , 2015, NIPS.

[20]  Melody Wiseheart,et al.  Artificial intelligence to support human instruction , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[22]  Nitin Madnani,et al.  Second Language Acquisition Modeling , 2018, BEA@NAACL-HLT.

[23]  Burr Settles,et al.  A Trainable Spaced Repetition Model for Language Learning , 2016, ACL.

[24]  L. Maanen,et al.  Passing the test: Improving Learning Gains by Balancing Spacing and Testing Effects , 2009 .

[25]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[26]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  The Effects of Summer Vacation on Achievement Test Scores: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review , 1996 .

[27]  R. Bjork,et al.  Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  How Deep is Knowledge Tracing? , 2016, EDM.

[29]  Glenn Gunzelmann,et al.  Personalizing Training to Acquire and Sustain Competence Through Use of a Cognitive Model , 2017, HCI.

[30]  Ed Vul,et al.  Predicting the Optimal Spacing of Study: A Multiscale Context Model of Memory , 2009, NIPS.