Self-organised critical hot spots of criminal activity

In this paper 1 we introduce a family of models to describe the spatio-temporal dynamics of criminal activity. It is argued here that with a minimal set of mechanisms corresponding to elements that are basic in the study of crime, one can observe the formation of hot spots. By analysing the simplest versions of our model, we exhibit a self-organised critical state of illegal activities that we propose to call a warm spot or a tepid milieu 2 depending on the context. It is characterised by a positive level of illegal or uncivil activity that maintains itself without exploding, in contrast with genuine hot spots where localised high level or peaks are being formed. Within our framework, we further investigate optimal policy issues under the constraint of limited resources in law enforcement and deterrence. We also introduce extensions of our model that take into account repeated victimisation effects, local and long range interactions, and briefly discuss some of the resulting effects such as hysteresis phenomena.

[1]  Andrea L. Bertozzi,et al.  c ○ World Scientific Publishing Company A STATISTICAL MODEL OF CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR , 2008 .

[2]  J. Sethna Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity , 2021 .

[3]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Crime and Social Interactions , 1995 .

[4]  F. Bourguignon,et al.  A Structural Model of Crime and Inequality in Colombia , 2003 .

[5]  E. M.,et al.  Statistical Mechanics , 2021, On Complementarity.

[6]  J. Crane The Epidemic Theory of Ghettos and Neighborhood Effects on Dropping Out and Teenage Childbearing , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  M. Felson,et al.  Routine activity and rational choice , 2004 .

[8]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  Simulation for Theory Testing and Experimentation: An Example Using Routine Activity Theory and Street Robbery , 2007 .

[9]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Working Paper No . 601 , 2003 Social Networks and Crime Decisions : The Role of Social Structure in Facilitating Delinquent Behavior , 2003 .

[10]  Mirta B. Gordon,et al.  A random walk in the literature on criminality: A partial and critical view on some statistical analyses and modelling approaches , 2010, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[11]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Lapicque’s 1907 paper: from frogs to integrate-and-fire , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  Modeling Micro-Level Crime Location Choice: Application of the Discrete Choice Framework to Crime at Places , 2010 .

[13]  Denis Phan,et al.  Discrete Choices under Social Influence:Generic Properties , 2007, 0704.2333.

[14]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[15]  Andrea L Bertozzi,et al.  Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Ken Pease,et al.  Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization , 2009 .

[17]  Juan Carlos Nuño,et al.  A triangle model of criminality , 2008 .

[18]  R. Berk How you can tell if the simulations in computational criminology are any good , 2008 .

[19]  J. Nadal,et al.  Crime and punishment: the economic burden of impunity , 2007, 0710.3751.

[20]  Crime: Economic Incentives and Social Networks , 2005 .

[21]  D. Nagin,et al.  Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime , 1993 .

[22]  Ashley B. Pitcher Adding police to a mathematical model of burglary , 2010, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[23]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[24]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality , 1997 .

[25]  What part of the income distribution does matter for explaining crime ? The case of Columbia , 2003 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Nadal,et al.  Multiple equilibria in a monopoly market with heterogeneous agents and externalities , 2005 .

[27]  John E. Eck,et al.  Contrasting simulated and empirical experiments in crime prevention , 2008 .

[28]  J. Nadal,et al.  Modelling the individual and collective dynamics of the propensity to offend , 2010, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.