Using GIS to Assess the Environmental Justice Consequences of Transportation System Changes

Although environmental justice research has typically focused on locations of industrial toxic releases or waste sites, recent developments in GIS and environmental modeling provide a foundation for developing measures designed to evaluate the consequences of transportation system changes. In this paper, we develop and demonstrate a workable GIS-based approach that can be used to assess the impacts of a transportation system change on minorites and low-income residents. We focus specifically on two adverse affects: vehicle-generated air pollution and noise. The buffer analysis capabilities of GIS provide a preliminary assessment of environmental justice. We integrate existing environmental pollution models with GIS software to identify the specific locations where noise and air pollution standards could be violated because of the proposed system change. A comparison of the geographic boundaries of these areas with the racial and economic characteristics of the underlying population obtained from block level census data provides a basis for evaluating disproportionate impacts. An existing urban arterial in Waterloo, Iowa, is used to illustrate the methods developed in this research.

[1]  W. Tobler.  Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions. , 1979, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[2]  W. Bowen,et al.  Toward Environmental Justice: Spatial Equity in Ohio and Cleveland , 1995 .

[3]  David J. Forkenbrock,et al.  Environmental Justice and Transportation Investment Policy , 1997 .

[4]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  The Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring Environmental Justice , 1996 .

[5]  Shauna Hallmark,et al.  Integrating Geographic Information Systems for Transportation and Air Quality Models for Microscale Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  P. Asch,et al.  Some evidence on the distribution of air quality. [Correlations with income] , 1978 .

[7]  Robin Flowerdew,et al.  Data integration: Statistical methods for transferring data between zonal systems , 1991 .

[8]  Yichun Xie.  The overlaid network algorithms for areal interpolation problem , 1995 .

[9]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Issues of Classification in Environmental Equity: How We Manage is How We Measure , 1994 .

[10]  N. Lam.  Spatial Interpolation Methods: A Review , 1983 .

[11]  R. Souleyrette.  GIS FOR TRANSPORTATION AND AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS. , 1992 .

[12]  I D Williams,et al.  Road traffic nuisance in residential and commercial areas. , 1995, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Roger Bezdek.  Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions , 1995 .

[14]  J Schwartz,et al.  Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[15]  Neil Ingham,et al.  Environmental impact: What? , 1974 .

[16]  Transportation Emissions and Environmental Health: An Evaluatory Planning Methodology , 1976 .

[17]  M. Monmonier,et al.  Land use and land cover data and the mapping of population density. , 1984 .

[18]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  ANALYSIS OF FINE PARTICULATE MATTER NEAR URBAN ROADWAYS , 1993 .

[19]  B Hokanson,et al.  MEASURES OF NOISE DAMAGE COSTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO MOTOR VEHICLE TRAVEL , 1981 .

[20]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Areal interpolation: A variant of the traditional spatial problem , 1980 .

[21]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Exploring the Use of Buffer Analysis for the Identification of Impacted Areas in Environmental Equity Assessment , 1997 .