Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms

Improving content sharing on social media platforms helps firms enhance the efficacy of their marketing campaigns. The authors study the impact of network overlap—the overlap in network connections between two users—on content sharing in directed social media platforms. The authors propose a hazards model that flexibly captures the impact of three measures of network overlap (i.e., common followees, common followers, and common mutual followers) on content sharing. Using data on content sharing from two directed social media platforms (Twitter and Digg), the authors establish that a receiver is more likely to share content from a sender with whom they share more common followees, common followers, or common mutual followers even after accounting for other measures. In addition, common followers have a higher effect than common mutual followers on the sharing propensity of the receiver. Finally, the effect of common followers and common mutual followers is positive when the content is novel but decreases, and may even become negative, when many others have already shared it. Collectively, these results have a bearing for marketers to more effectively target users for spreading content on social media platforms.

[1]  William Rand,et al.  Differential Adaptive Diffusion: Understanding Diversity and Learning Whom to Trust in Viral Marketing , 2011, ICWSM.

[2]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Trust and the Strength of Ties in Online Social Networks: An Exploratory Field Experiment , 2017, MIS Q..

[3]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Bias in Fixed-Effects Cox Regression with Dummy Variables , 2002 .

[4]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Deriving Value from Social Commerce Networks , 2009 .

[5]  Roland Soong,et al.  Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand , 1986 .

[6]  Mark Wallace,et al.  The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Bryan Langholz,et al.  Counter-matching: A stratified nested case-control sampling method , 1995 .

[8]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[9]  M. Sarvary,et al.  Network Effects and Personal Influences: The Diffusion of an Online Social Network , 2011 .

[10]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[11]  Sha Yang,et al.  Modeling the Formation of Dyadic Relationships between Consumers in Online Communities , 2007 .

[12]  Dokyun Lee,et al.  Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[13]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[14]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment on Peer Influence in Online Social Networks - Online E-Companion Appendix , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[15]  David A. Schweidel,et al.  Modeling the role of message content and influencers in social media rebroadcasting , 2017 .

[16]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[17]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  The effects of social- and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth , 2013 .

[18]  B. Libai,et al.  Social Effects on Customer Retention , 2011 .

[19]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[20]  Peter R. Darke,et al.  The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word-of-mouth , 2006 .

[21]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[22]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity , 2004, CHI.

[23]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[24]  William Rand,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling in Marketing: Guidelines for Rigor , 2011 .

[25]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[26]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Hema Yoganarasimhan,et al.  Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data , 2011, Quantitative Marketing and Economics.

[28]  Elizabeth Eskow,et al.  A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[29]  Ting Wang,et al.  Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in twitter , 2013, SIGIR.

[30]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[31]  J. Arndt Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product , 1967 .

[32]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model , 2000 .

[33]  Jonah A. Berger Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research , 2014 .

[34]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[35]  T. Lancaster The incidental parameter problem since 1948 , 2000 .

[36]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[37]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  The Megaphone Effect: Taste and Audience in Fashion Blogging , 2013 .

[38]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Param Vir Singh,et al.  The Emergence of Opinion Leaders in a Networked Online Community: A Dyadic Model with Time Dynamics and a Heuristic for Fast Estimation , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[40]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks , 2001 .

[41]  Amar Cheema,et al.  The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth , 2010 .

[42]  Grant Packard,et al.  Compensatory Knowledge Signaling in Consumer Word-of-Mouth , 2013 .

[43]  M. Haenlein Social interactions in customer churn decisions: The impact of relationship directionality☆ , 2013 .

[44]  Jason Ho,et al.  Viral marketing: Motivations to forward online content , 2010 .

[45]  W. Greene,et al.  The Behaviour of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Limited Dependent Variable Models in the Presence of Fixed Effects , 2004 .

[46]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[47]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[48]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff , 2010 .

[49]  Dokyun Lee,et al.  Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook , 2017 .

[50]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Improving Penetration Forecasts Using Social Interactions Data , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[51]  G. Lilien,et al.  A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing , 2008 .

[52]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share , 2013 .

[53]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Influence of Familial and Peer-Based Reference Groups on Consumer Decisions , 1992 .

[54]  David A. Schweidel,et al.  Listening in on Social Media: A Joint Model of Sentiment and Venue Format Choice , 2014 .

[55]  David Dubois,et al.  Sharing with Friends versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence , 2016 .

[56]  Xuping Jiang,et al.  Tweeting as a Marketing Tool: A Field Experiment in the TV Industry , 2017 .

[57]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Social Ties and User Generated Content: Evidence from an Online Social Network , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[59]  Daniel Zelterman,et al.  Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model , 2002, Technometrics.

[60]  Bryan Langholz,et al.  Risk set sampling in epidemiologic cohort studies , 1996 .

[61]  R. Shachar,et al.  On Brands and Word of Mouth , 2013 .

[62]  Yansong Hu,et al.  Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[63]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[64]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Content Sharing in a Social Broadcasting Environment: Evidence from Twitter , 2014, MIS Q..

[65]  Yong Tan,et al.  Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Caroline Wiertz,et al.  Advertising to Early Trend Propagators: Evidence from Twitter , 2017 .

[68]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  How Word-of-Mouth Transmission Encouragement Affects Consumers’ Transmission Decisions, Receiver Selection, and Diffusion Speed , 2016 .

[69]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison , 2011 .

[70]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  The microstructures of network recall: How social networks are encoded and represented in human memory , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[71]  Stefan Wuyts,et al.  Social Networks in Marketing , 2007 .

[72]  Xiaohua Zeng,et al.  Social Ties and User Content Generation: Evidence from Flickr , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Michael Braun,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Modeling the Effects of Multiple Creatives and Individual Impression Histories , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[74]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[75]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter? , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[77]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data , 2005 .

[78]  Kelly Tepper Tian,et al.  Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation , 2001 .