Proceedings of the 3 r d Joint 161 Syrnpsstuim sn Neural Computatfon

DeCharms et a1. (1995) have provided evidence for stimulus-dependent changes in the correlations between spike trains of simultaneously-recorded pairs of neurons from the auditory cortex of marmosets even when there was no change in the average firing rates. Most of the characteristics of these experimental observations can be reproduced by a simple model based on neurons having leaky integration, fire-and-reset spikes and with Poissondistributed, balanced input. The source of synchrony in the model was common sensory input. Spike frequency adaptation was implemented by sensory-driven, delayed inhibition. The outputs of neurons in the model appear noisy (almost Poisson) owing to the stochastic nature of the input signal, but there is nevertheless a strong central peak in the correlation of the output spike trains. The experimental data and this simple model clearly demonstrate how even a noisy-looking spike train can convey basic information about a sensory stimulus in the relative spike timing between neurons. We address the binding problem and show why sykhrony without periodicity might be advantageous in representing multiple objects at the same cortical site simultaneously.

[1]  D. Baylor,et al.  Concerted Signaling by Retinal Ganglion Cells , 1995, Science.

[2]  J. J. Hopfield,et al.  Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation , 1995, Nature.

[3]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Stimulus-Dependent Synchronization of Neuronal Assemblies , 1993, Neural Computation.

[4]  O. Prospero-Garcia,et al.  Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons , 1995 .

[5]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Why spikes? Hebbian learning and retrieval of time-resolved excitation patterns , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  RANDOM WALK MODELS FOR THE SPIKE ACTIVITY OF A SINGLE NEURON. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[8]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  The Correlation Theory of Brain Function , 1994 .

[14]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.