Minimizing Expected Deviation in Upper-level Outcomes Due to Lower-level Decision-making in Hierarchical Multi-objective Optimization Problems

—Many societal and industrial problem solving tasks involving search, optimization, design and management, are conveniently decomposed into hierarchical sub- problems. While the process allows a systematic procedure to have a multi-stakeholder solution, an independent decision- making process for the lower-level problem causes a deviation in expected outcome at the upper-level problem. In this paper, we provide a new and computationally efficient evolutionary approach for the upper-level decision-makers to analyze vagaries of lower-level decision-making for choosing a preferred solution with the minimum deviation from their expectations. The concept is novel and pragmatic. We demonstrate the concept through a search for optimistic-pessimistic trade-off solutions found by an evolutionary multi-objective optimization approach first on two difficult test problems, followed by a watershed management problem, and a telecommunication management problem. The approach is generic and can be applied to other similar hierarchical management problems for achieving minimum deviation with a more predictive and reliable outcome. The proposed solution procedure is found to choose an optimistic solution causing about 31% to 65% reduced deviation compared to another optimistic solution chosen at random in test problems and about 85% to 95% in two practical problems, making such a study worthy for practical hierarchical problems.

[1]  Ankur Sinha,et al.  Solving Bilevel Optimization Problems Using Kriging Approximations , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[2]  Steven R. Miller,et al.  Evaluating the climate resilience in terms of profitability and risk for a long-term corn-soybean-wheat rotation under different treatment systems , 2021 .

[3]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  BiLO-CPDP: Bi-Level Programming for Automated Model Discovery in Cross-Project Defect Prediction , 2020, 2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE).

[4]  Bernardo Mueller Why public policies fail: Policymaking under complexity , 2019, EconomiA.

[5]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  H. Turral,et al.  More people, more food, worse water? a global review of water pollution from agriculture , 2018 .

[7]  Tapabrata Ray,et al.  An Enhanced Memetic Algorithm for Single-Objective Bilevel Optimization Problems , 2016, Evolutionary Computation.

[8]  Dongqing Zhang,et al.  A bi-level evolutionary optimization approach for integrated production and transportation scheduling , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Damien Raclot,et al.  Relative Contribution of Rill/Interrill and Gully/Channel Erosion to Small Reservoir Siltation in Mediterranean Environments , 2016 .

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Solving Bilevel Multicriterion Optimization Problems With Lower Level Decision Uncertainty , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Yew-Soon Ong,et al.  Evolutionary multitasking in bi-level optimization , 2015 .

[12]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Large-scale parallelization of the Borg multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to enhance the management of complex environmental systems , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Joachim Güntzel,et al.  Complexity and the Art of Public Policy: Solving Society’s Problems from the Bottom Up , 2015 .

[14]  I. Chaubey,et al.  Defining Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic response units (HRUs) by field boundaries , 2015 .

[15]  R. Färe,et al.  Spatial Targeting of Agri-Environmental Policy Using Bilevel Evolutionary Optimization , 2014 .

[16]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  A social science-inspired complexity policy: Beyond the mantra of incentivization , 2014, Complex..

[17]  Jeffery R. Williams,et al.  Cropland management versus dredging: An economic analysis of reservoir sediment management , 2013 .

[18]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[19]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Efficient and Accurate Solution Methodology for Bilevel Multi-Objective Programming Problems Using a Hybrid Evolutionary-Local-Search Algorithm , 2010, Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[21]  Anish Mathew Kurien,et al.  Optimization of Antenna Placement in 3G Networks Using Genetic Algorithms , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Broadband Communications, Information Technology & Biomedical Applications.

[22]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[23]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2006, GECCO.

[24]  Yuping Wang,et al.  An evolutionary algorithm for solving nonlinear bilevel programming based on a new constraint-handling scheme , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[25]  Stephan Dempe,et al.  Foundations of Bilevel Programming , 2002 .

[26]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[27]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications , 1998 .

[28]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[29]  Erkki Laitinen,et al.  Radio coverage optimization with genetic algorithms , 1998, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (Cat. No.98TH8361).

[30]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil Erosion Impact on Agronomic Productivity and Environment Quality , 1998 .

[31]  C. Lant,et al.  Drainage District Formation and the Loss of Midwestern Wetlands, 1860-1930 , 1993 .