Grouping individual independent BOLD effects: a new way to ICA group analysis

A new group analysis method to summarize the task-related BOLD responses based on independent component analysis (ICA) was presented. As opposite to the previously proposed group ICA (gICA) method, which first combined multi-subject fMRI data in either temporal or spatial domain and applied ICA decomposition only once to the combined fMRI data to extract the task-related BOLD effects, the method presented here applied ICA decomposition to the individual subjects' fMRI data to first find the independent BOLD effects specifically for each individual subject. Then, the task-related independent BOLD component was selected among the resulting independent components from the single-subject ICA decomposition and hence grouped across subjects to derive the group inference. In this new ICA group analysis (ICAga) method, one does not need to assume that the task-related BOLD time courses are identical across brain areas and subjects as used in the grand ICA decomposition on the spatially concatenated fMRI data. Neither does one need to assume that after spatial normalization, the voxels at the same coordinates represent exactly the same functional or structural brain anatomies across different subjects. These two assumptions have been problematic given the recent BOLD activation evidences. Further, since the independent BOLD effects were obtained from each individual subject, the ICAga method can better account for the individual differences in the task-related BOLD effects. Unlike the gICA approach whereby the task-related BOLD effects could only be accounted for by a single unified BOLD model across multiple subjects. As a result, the newly proposed method, ICAga, was able to better fit the task-related BOLD effects at individual level and thus allow grouping more appropriate multisubject BOLD effects in the group analysis.

[1]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[2]  E E Smith,et al.  Components of verbal working memory: evidence from neuroimaging. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Tulay Adali,et al.  A method for comparing group fMRI data using independent component analysis: application to visual, motor and visuomotor tasks. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Charles R. G. Guttmann,et al.  Functional MRI of auditory verbal working memory: long-term reproducibility analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Single-Trial Variability in Event-Related BOLD Signals , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Markus Svensén,et al.  ICA of fMRI Group Study Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Effect of Normal Aging on the Coupling of Neural Activity to the Bold Hemodynamic Response , 1999, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. Mintun,et al.  Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity. , 1988, Science.

[11]  K. Worsley Detecting activation in fMRI data , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[12]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[13]  R. Woods Modeling for Intergroup Comparisons of Imaging Data , 1996, NeuroImage.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional activation of the human frontal cortex during the performance of verbal working memory tasks. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D B Rowe,et al.  Bayesian source separation for reference function determination in fMRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.