Optimal Design of Multitype Groundwater Monitoring Networks Using Easily Accessible Tools.

Monitoring networks are expensive to establish and to maintain. In this paper, we extend an existing data-worth estimation method from the suite of PEST utilities with a global optimization method for optimal sensor placement (called optimal design) in groundwater monitoring networks. Design optimization can include multiple simultaneous sensor locations and multiple sensor types. Both location and sensor type are treated simultaneously as decision variables. Our method combines linear uncertainty quantification and a modified genetic algorithm for discrete multilocation, multitype search. The efficiency of the global optimization is enhanced by an archive of past samples and parallel computing. We demonstrate our methodology for a groundwater monitoring network at the Steinlach experimental site, south-western Germany, which has been established to monitor river-groundwater exchange processes. The target of optimization is the best possible exploration for minimum variance in predicting the mean travel time of the hyporheic exchange. Our results demonstrate that the information gain of monitoring network designs can be explored efficiently and with easily accessible tools prior to taking new field measurements or installing additional measurement points. The proposed methods proved to be efficient and can be applied for model-based optimal design of any type of monitoring network in approximately linear systems. Our key contributions are (1) the use of easy-to-implement tools for an otherwise complex task and (2) yet to consider data-worth interdependencies in simultaneous optimization of multiple sensor locations and sensor types.

[1]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  A new epsilon-dominance hierarchical Bayesian optimization algorithm for large multiobjective monitoring network design problems , 2008 .

[2]  Henning Prommer,et al.  Suitability of temperature, hydraulic heads, and acesulfame to quantify wastewater‐related fluxes in the hyporheic and riparian zone , 2013 .

[3]  Henning Prommer,et al.  Using predictive uncertainty analysis to optimise tracer test design and data acquisition , 2014 .

[4]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Bayesian assessment of the expected data impact on prediction confidence in optimal sampling design , 2012 .

[5]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian geostatistical design: Task‐driven optimal site investigation when the geostatistical model is uncertain , 2010 .

[6]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Sampling Design Methods For Groundwater Modeling Under Uncertainty , 1995 .

[7]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Dynamic Optimal Monitoring Network Design for Transient Transport of Pollutants in Groundwater Aquifers , 2008 .

[8]  Christian D Langevin,et al.  Quantifying Data Worth Toward Reducing Predictive Uncertainty , 2010, Ground water.

[9]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Interactive design of experiments: A priori global versus sequential optimization, revised under changing states of knowledge , 2015 .

[10]  Yingqi Zhang,et al.  Least cost design of groundwater quality monitoring networks , 2005 .

[11]  S. Gorelick,et al.  When enough is enough: The worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design , 1994 .

[12]  Kevin E Lansey,et al.  Effect of uncertainty on water distribution system model design decisions , 2009 .

[13]  J. Doherty,et al.  Role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error , 2005 .

[14]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Methods for using groundwater model predictions to guide hydrogeologic data collection, with application to the Death Valley regional groundwater flow system , 2003 .

[15]  Olaf A. Cirpka,et al.  Assessing hyporheic exchange and associated travel times by hydraulic, chemical, and isotopic monitoring at the Steinlach Test Site, Germany , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[16]  Michael Finkel,et al.  Algorithmic funnel‐and‐gate system design optimization , 2007 .

[17]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Uncertainty and data worth analysis for the hydraulic design of funnel‐and‐gate systems in heterogeneous aquifers , 2004 .

[18]  John Doherty,et al.  Predictive error dependencies when using pilot points and singular value decomposition in groundwater model calibration , 2008 .

[19]  Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee,et al.  Measurement network design including traveltime determinations to minimize model prediction uncertainty , 2008 .

[20]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Bayesian analysis of data-worth considering model and parameter uncertainties , 2012 .

[21]  Harald Kunstmann,et al.  Conditional first‐order second‐moment method and its application to the quantification of uncertainty in groundwater modeling , 2002 .