ATCEM: a synthetic model for evaluating air traffic complexity

Summary Air traffic complexity, which measures the disorder of air traffic distribution, has become the critical indicator to reflect air traffic controller workload in air traffic management (ATM) system. However, it is hard to assess the system accurately because there are too many correlated factors, which make the air traffic complexity nonlinear. This paper presents an air traffic complexity evaluation model with integrated classification using computational intelligence (ATCEM). To avoid redundant factors, critical factors contributing to complexity are analyzed and selected from numerous factors in the ATCEM. Subsequently, to construct the mapping relationship between selected factors and air traffic complexity, an integrated classifier is built in ATCEM. With efficient training and learning based on aviation domain knowledge, the integrated classifier can effectively and stably reflect the mapping relationship between selected factors and the category of air traffic complexity to ensure the precision of the evaluation. Empirical studies using real data of the southwest airspace of China show that the ATCEM outperforms a number of state-of-the-art models. Moreover, using the critical complexity factors selected in ATCEM, the air traffic complexity could be effectively estimated. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Weigang Li,et al.  Agent Evaluation Function Considering Airspace Dynamic Density , 2010, 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[2]  R. H. Mogford,et al.  The Complexity Construct in Air Traffic Control: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. , 1995 .

[3]  Hartmut Fricke,et al.  Air traffic control complexity as workload driver , 2010 .

[4]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Airspace Complexity and its Application in Air Traffic Management , 1998 .

[5]  Carlos E. Pedreira,et al.  Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: a review and evaluation , 2001 .

[6]  P. Averty 6 th USA/Europe ATM2005 R&D Seminar Conflict Perception by ATCS Admits Doubt but not Inconsistency , 2005 .

[7]  Panos A. Ligomenides,et al.  GANNET: a genetic algorithm for searching topology and weight spaces in neural network design. The first step in finding a neural network solution , 1993 .

[8]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[9]  Maria Prandini,et al.  A probabilistic measure of air traffic complexity in 3‐D airspace , 2010 .

[10]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Parimal Kopardekar,et al.  Airspace Complexity Measurement: An Air Traffic Control Simulation Analysis , 2009 .

[12]  David Gianazza,et al.  Forecasting workload and airspace configuration with neural networks and tree search methods , 2010, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Neural Network Ensembles , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Measures for air traffic controller workload prediction , 2001 .

[15]  Brian Hilburn,et al.  COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[16]  K. Guittet,et al.  Selection and Evaluation of Air Traffic Complexity Metrics , 2006, 2006 ieee/aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[17]  Luigi Piroddi,et al.  Toward Air Traffic Complexity Assessment in New Generation Air Traffic Management Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.