Understanding email use: predicting action on a message

Email consumes significant time and attention in the workplace. We conducted an organizational survey to understand how and why people attend to incoming email messages. We examined people's ratings of message importance and the actions they took on specific email messages, based on message characteristics and characteristics of receivers and senders. Respondents kept half of their new messages in the inbox and replied to about a third of them. They rated messages as important if they were about work and required action. Importance, in turn, had a modest impact on whether people replied to their incoming messages and whether they saved them. The results indicate that factors other than message importance (e.g., their social nature) also determine how people handle email. Overall, email usage reflects attentional differences due both to personal propensities and to work demands and relationships.

[1]  Jeff A. Johnson,et al.  Integrating communication and information through ContactMap , 2002, CACM.

[2]  Thomas Jackson,et al.  The cost of email interruption , 2001, Journal of Systems and Information Technology.

[3]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  Managerial Communication Patterns , 1992 .

[4]  Mary Sumner,et al.  The impact of electronic mail on managerial and organizational communications , 1988, COCS '88.

[5]  Brad Hartfield,et al.  Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction , 1988, TOIS.

[6]  John F. Meech,et al.  An agent-based system for email highlighting , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[7]  Jonathan J. Cadiz,et al.  Marked for deletion: an analysis of email data , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Attention-Sensitive Alerting , 1999, UAI.

[9]  Gary Boone,et al.  Concept features in Re:Agent, an intelligent Email agent , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[10]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry , 1988, TOIS.

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Media Use in a Global Corporation: Electronic Mail and Organizational Knowledge , 2003 .

[12]  Christine Neuwirth,et al.  Envisioning communication: task-tailorable representations of communication in asynchronous work , 1998, CSCW '98.

[13]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[14]  STEVE WHITTAKER,et al.  The character, value, and management of personal paper archives , 2001, TCHI.

[15]  Henry Mintzberg The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[16]  Olle Bälter,et al.  Keystroke level analysis of email message organization , 2000, CHI.

[17]  Ian Smith,et al.  Taking email to task: the design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool , 2003, CHI '03.

[18]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Collaborative Interface Agents , 1994, AAAI.

[19]  John C. Tang,et al.  When Can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage , 2003, ECSCW.

[20]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[21]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Supporting Email Workflow , 2001 .

[22]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail , 1998, AAAI 1998.

[23]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Intelligent information-sharing systems , 1987, CACM.

[24]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management , 2001, INTR.

[25]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Classify Email into “Speech Acts” , 2004, EMNLP.