Development of a flexible, realistic hearing in noise test environment (R-HINT-E)

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  A novel signal-processing strategy for hearing-aid design: neurocompensation , 2004, Signal Process..

[2]  R. Gribonval,et al.  Proposals for Performance Measurement in Source Separation , 2003 .

[3]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. Kochkin.  MarkeTrak V: “Why my hearing aids are in the drawer” The consumers' perspective , 2000 .

[6]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Perceptual Quality Assessment for Digital Audio: PEAQ-The New ITU Standard for Objective Measurement of the Perceived Audio Quality , 1999 .

[8]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  A minimum‐variance frequency‐domain algorithm for binaural hearing aid processing , 1999 .

[9]  V. Michael Bove,et al.  Applying Blind Source Separation and Deconvolution to Real-World Acoustic Environments , 1999 .

[10]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Paris Smaragdis,et al.  Evaluation of blind signal separation methods , 1999 .

[12]  J M Kates,et al.  A comparison of hearing-aid array processing techniques. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B. Moore.  Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage , 1995 .

[14]  David V. Anderson,et al.  Application of a human auditory model to loudness perception and hearing compensation , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Plomp.  Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[17]  P. Peterson,et al.  Intelligibility-weighted measures of speech-to-interference ratio and speech system performance. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Arlinger,et al.  Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[21]  R. Plomp,et al.  Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R. Plomp.  A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  A. Duquesnoy.  Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  H. Fletcher,et al.  Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. , 1933 .

[27]  J. Proudfoot,et al.  Noise , 1931, The Indian medical gazette.