Tongue-Rudder: A Glossokinetic-Potential-Based Tongue–Machine Interface

Glossokinetic potentials (GKPs) are electric potential responses generated by tongue movement. In this study, we use these GKPs to automatically detect and estimate tongue positions, and develop a tongue-machine interface. We show that a specific configuration of electrode placement yields discriminative GKPs that vary depending on the direction of the tongue. We develop a linear model to determine the direction of tongue from GKPs, where we seek linear features that are robust to a baseline drift problem by maximizing the ratio of intertask covariance to intersession covariance. We apply our method to the task of wheelchair control, developing a tongue-machine interface for wheelchair control, referred to as tongue-rudder. A teeth clenching detection system, using electromyography, was also implemented in the system in order to assign teeth clenching as the stop command. Experiments on off-line cursor control and online wheelchair control confirm the unique advantages of our method, such as: 1) noninvasiveness, 2) fine controllability, and 3) ability to integrate with other EEG-based interface systems.

[1]  P. Tallgren,et al.  Evaluation of commercially available electrodes and gels for recording of slow EEG potentials , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Walker Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields , 1982 .

[3]  R. C. Pratap,et al.  The speech evoked potential in normal subjects and patients with cerebral hemispheric lesions , 1987, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[4]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  A Tongue-Machine Interface: Detection of Tongue Positions by Glossokinetic Potentials , 2010, ICONIP.

[5]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  An isometric tongue pointing device , 1997, CHI.

[6]  R. Ward,et al.  EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: A survey , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  S Vanhatalo,et al.  Topography and elimination of slow EEG responses related to tongue movements , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Toshiharu Mukai,et al.  Drifting and Blinking Compensation in Electro-oculography (EOG) Eye-gaze Interface , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[10]  Wolfgang Nutt,et al.  Tongue-mouse for quadriplegics , 1998 .

[11]  Kyuwan Choi,et al.  Control of a Wheelchair by Motor Imagery in Real Time , 2008, IDEAL.

[12]  Fay S. Tyner,et al.  Fundamentals of Eeg Technology: Vol. 1: Basic Concepts and Methods , 1983 .

[13]  P. Tallgren,et al.  DC-EEG for routine clinical use : methods and clinical impact , 2006 .

[14]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Using Unconstrained Tongue Motion as an Alternative Control Mechanism for Wheeled Mobility , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Tongue drive: a tongue operated magnetic sensor based wireless assistive technology for people with severe disabilities , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[16]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[17]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  An Inductive Tongue Computer Interface for Control of Computers and Assistive Devices , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  H Shibasaki,et al.  Generator locations of movement-related potentials with tongue protrusions and vocalizations: subdural recording in human. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.