Continuous use of ERP-based BCIs with different visual angles in ALS patients

Objective: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare disease, but is also one of the most common motor neuron diseases, and people of all races and ethnic backgrounds are affected. There is currently no cure. Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) can establish a communication channel directly between the brain and an external device by recognizing brain activities that reflect user intent. Therefore, this technology could help ALS patients in promoting functional independence through BCI-based speller systems and motor assistive devices. Methods: In this paper, two kinds of ERP-based speller systems were tested on 18 ALS patients to: (1) assess performance when they spelled 42 characters online continuously, without a break; and (2) to compare performance between a matrix-based speller paradigm (MS-P, mean visual angle 6 degree) and a new speller paradigm that used a larger visual angle called the large visual angle speller paradigm (LS-P, mean visual angle 8 degree). Results: Although results showed that there were no significant differences between the two paradigms in accuracy trend over continuous use (p>0.05), the fatigue during the LS-P condition was significantly lower than that of MS-P (p<0.05). Results also showed that continuous use slightly reduced the performance of this ERP-based BCI. Conclusion: 15 subjects obtained higher than 80% feedback accuracy (online output accuracy) and 9 subjects obtained higher than 90% feedback accuracy in one of the two paradigms, thus validating the BCI approaches in this study. Significance: Most ALS subjects in this study could spell effectively after continuous use of an ERP-based BCI. The new LS-P display may be easier for subjects to use, resulting in lower fatigue.

[1]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  An exploration of spatial auditory BCI paradigms with different sounds: music notes versus beeps , 2016, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[2]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Wei Wu,et al.  Multimodal BCIs: Target Detection, Multidimensional Control, and Awareness Evaluation in Patients With Disorder of Consciousness , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Xin Zhao,et al.  Use of a steady-state baseline to address evoked vs. oscillation models of visual evoked potential origin , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  A. Cichocki,et al.  An optimized ERP brain–computer interface based on facial expression changes , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Does the ‘P300’ speller depend on eye gaze? , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning for Obtaining Sparsity of EEG Frequency Bands Based Feature Vectors in Motor Imagery Classification , 2017, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[10]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Hu,et al.  Gaze independent brain–computer speller with covert visual search tasks , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Kübler,et al.  Toward brain-computer interface based wheelchair control utilizing tactually-evoked event-related potentials , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Gaze-independent BCI-spelling using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  G. Riva,et al.  The use of P300-based BCIs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from augmentative and alternative communication to cognitive assessment , 2012, Brain and behavior.

[16]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  A brain computer interface-based explorer , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  A proposed staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2014, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[19]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EEG correlates of P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Yang Yu,et al.  A Dynamically Optimized SSVEP Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Speller , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[22]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) event-related potentials (ERPs): People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) vs. age-matched controls , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use , 2010, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[24]  Jan Kassubek,et al.  Eye-tracking controlled cognitive function tests in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a controlled proof-of-principle study , 2015, Journal of Neurology.

[25]  A. Kübler,et al.  Effects of training and motivation on auditory P300 brain–computer interface performance , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  An adaptive P300-based control system , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  Michele Lewis,et al.  The role of physical therapy and occupational therapy in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. , 2007, NeuroRehabilitation.

[28]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Attention and P300-based BCI performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  An ERP-Based BCI using an oddball Paradigm with Different Faces and Reduced errors in Critical Functions , 2014, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[31]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  An adaptive P 300-based control system , 2011 .

[32]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Oculomotor dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a comprehensive review. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[33]  N. V. Thakor,et al.  Translating the Brain-Machine Interface , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[34]  J. Farquhar,et al.  Comparing tactile and visual gaze-independent brain–computer interfaces in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and healthy users , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Eric W. Sellers,et al.  Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[36]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  Evaluate the Feasibility of Using Frontal SSVEP to Implement an SSVEP-Based BCI in Young, Elderly and ALS Groups , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  D. Yao,et al.  The graph theoretical analysis of the SSVEP harmonic response networks , 2015, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[39]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  Javier Gomez-Pilar,et al.  An Asynchronous P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Web Browser for Severely Disabled People , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[41]  G R Müller-Putz,et al.  Toward smarter BCIs: extending BCIs through hybridization and intelligent control , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[42]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[43]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface , 2005, Neurology.

[44]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  Comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual modality for brain-computer interface use: a case study with a patient in the locked-in state , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[45]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  Rui Xu,et al.  Toward a minimally invasive brain–computer interface using a single subdural channel: A visual speller study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[47]  F. Piccione,et al.  P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-computer interface: a new communication device for handicapped persons , 1993 .

[49]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[50]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  A hybrid brain–computer interface based on the fusion of electroencephalographic and electromyographic activities , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[51]  B O Mainsah,et al.  Increasing BCI communication rates with dynamic stopping towards more practical use: an ALS study , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[52]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[53]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Whether generic model works for rapid ERP-based BCI calibration , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[54]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  P300 Chinese input system based on Bayesian LDA , 2010, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[55]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A metanalysis , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[56]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  A. Kübler,et al.  Face stimuli effectively prevent brain–computer interface inefficiency in patients with neurodegenerative disease , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  P 300-based brain-computer interface ( BCI ) event-related potentials ( ERPs ) : People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ( ALS ) vs . age-matched controls , 2015 .

[59]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  A P300 Brain-Computer Interface Based on a Modification of the Mismatch Negativity Paradigm , 2015, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[60]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in completely paralyzed human patients , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[61]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  Independent home use of Brain Painting improves quality of life of two artists in the locked-in state diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2015 .

[62]  D. McFarland,et al.  An auditory brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[63]  R Ron-Angevin,et al.  Initial test of a T9-like P300-based speller by an ALS patient , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.