Variants of SOM

In order to create spatially ordered and organized representations of input occurrences in a neural network, the most essential principle seems to be to confine the learning corrections to subsets of network units that lie in the topological neighborhood of the best-matching unit. There seems to exist an indefinite number of ways to define the matching of an input occurrence with the internal representations, and even the neighborhood of a unit can be defined in many ways. It is neither necessary to define the corrections as gradient steps in the parameter space: improvements in matching may be achieved by batch computation or evolutionary changes. Consequently, all such cases will henceforth be regarded to belong to the broader category of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) algorithms. This category may also be thought to contain both supervised and unsupervised learning methods.

[1]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Emergence of invariant-feature detectors in the adaptive-subspace self-organizing map , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Jirí Benes,et al.  On neural networks , 1990, Kybernetika.

[4]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  'Neural-gas' network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction , 1993, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  Pasi Koikkalainen,et al.  Self-organizing hierarchical feature maps , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  Luís B. Almeida,et al.  Improving the Learning Speed in Topological Maps of Patterns , 1990 .

[7]  John Daugman,et al.  Six formal properties of two-dimensional anisotropie visual filters: Structural principles and frequency/orientation selectivity , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Neural Networks: Advances and Applications II , 1991 .

[10]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Computational Intelligence: A Dynamic System Perspective , 1995 .

[11]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The 'neural' phonetic typewriter , 1988, Computer.

[15]  J. G. Taylor New Developments in Neural Computing , 1989 .

[16]  J. G. Taylor,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, 2 , 1992 .